Comment Re:Did they really increase? (Score 1) 55
that particular amendment was voted down, bozo - the system works, no hand wringing required
doesn't mean hate speech doesn't exist
that particular amendment was voted down, bozo - the system works, no hand wringing required
doesn't mean hate speech doesn't exist
Oh, AI will stay with us. After all, people use it to make porn - a sure indicator of a technology's success.
But I expect the current bubble to pop before it is adopted with more reasonable expectations. (Both of its capabilities and of its profitability.)
I'm daydreaming about the data center I'm going to buy at firesale prices after the bubble bursts.
I'll sell the computers for boat anchors, and use the building and the cooling system to create a year-round indoor ski resort.
I'm pretty sure corporations are worse for the environment than people.
You're confident in suggesting that corporations don't cater to the demand of the market, the customers of whom seems to be waiting for the heads of those corporations to take the bus before they can be bothered to stop pissing in their own pools?
Tragedy of the commons to a tee.
I don't disagree with your first point.
I don't admire billionaires at all. I don't think they should exist. Wealth disparity is unchecked.
But that doesn't prevent me from operating within my own set of principles rather than in a sort of "you first" manner, which strikes me as quite child-like.
If every wealthy person on earth did the right thing, our environment would still be fucked, because they're vastly outnumbered by non-wealthy people.
So you're stuck on a sinking boat with a rich person, and you refuse to plug a hole until he or she plugs a hole.
The funny thing, by the time you smugly drown, they've already left the boat on a helicopter. The wealthy *be definition* will not feel the effects of worsening climate. You (and your kids) will.
I think it'd be far more intellectually honest to admit you just don't care. Nothing wrong with that, per se. It's a hell of a lot more logically defendable than your stated position.
The rare AI enthusiast
Hey, I know this is the site for devs who are so old that they're out of the game or enthusiasts who wish they could call themselves developers, but AI assisted coding is just plain normal today. It's not even controversial.
In all the projects you love, hate, or don't care about. If you're developing today and not using AI at all, you're the rare developer.
Maybe part of it is being relatively poor for such a large country [...],but there has to be more to it than that
Ex-superpower that can't afford it's lifestyle. Like the US will be in a few years if we don't sweep the idiots out of power.
Fudge, obviously I meant to reply to the OP. Your post clearly has some basis in being informed on the subject.
I am obviously not an expert but... we know what happens when you remove a species from the food chain.
In other words: "I don't know what happens, but we (I) know what happens
Like, honestly, dude.
Chances that you do this: zero
You are out of your mind with this false equivalency.
For some people's beliefs and values, whataboutism is all they've got to offer.
Well, that and projecting.
People have lost all sense when they hear "AI".
The even shout "aieeeeee!" when some something scares them.
But why keep evidence of embezzlement at home?
Yeah, I think they forgot to include "stupid" in the long list of his faults.
"I've seen the pictures" says another American who figures using the internet amounts to actually living life, going places, being less of a moron.
This login session: $13.76, but for you $11.88.