Except they are above the ethnic distribution.

If they wanted to match they would need to hire more native americans and fire a whole bunch of black people and asians.

Is there a -1 Trump option?

Go directly to jail, do not pass Go(ogle)

Dey duuk arr duuuur!

Is there any outcome here where both parties get sent to jail? Cause that's the one I'm rooting for.

>The hurdle partly stems from the growing ubiquity of drug testing, at corporations with big human resources departments, in industries like trucking where testing is mandated by federal law for safety reasons, and increasingly at smaller companies.

>With the software industry already plagued by a shortage of skilled workers, especially female programmers, some software companies think now would be the wrong time to institute drug testing for new employees, a move that would further limit the available talent pool.

I guess the number of female truckers is A-OK.

I don't place any value at all in these awards anymore, not after what the puppies showed to be true regarding the Hugos. And that sucks for the actual and talented authors out there that no longer get the spotlight they deserve for doing an excellent job.

I'm not sure if that's a win for the ideologues, but it's damn sure a loss for the actual writers.

"We found the evidence, we set it on fire, and now we can't find any evidence that this report is true. Rest assured that we will not stop until we can no longer find any evidence that this was ever true".

You make it sound like a bad thing. I would welcome any form of fairness doctrine regardless of how it affects the political situation. The end result can only be positive for the voters, short-term and long.

Or we can throw them in the ocean to see if they float or drown.

Unless Reddit explicitly stated that it was a platform for free speech, then I guess it has some sort of (moral) obligation to stand by that. Has Reddit ever said anything like that?

I sure hope so otherwise you'd be the worst stalker ever.

I don't give a rat's ass about the socio-economic status of the people affected.

I do care about net neutrality.

The idea that penalising certain data sources is harmful to a free internet seems well accepted. The fact that our retarded legislators couldn't figure out what so many were shouting at them is the real problem. There is no goddamn difference between penalising source A and "helping" every source *except* A. These zero-ratings is the exact thing we said would happen. It's penalising the companies that do not pay for "premium" services.