At this point, forcing âoebrowser choiceâ on Microsoft is basically just giving more money to Google.

Waymo cars donâ(TM)t speed, they stop at the stop signs, they give turn signals, they follow all the rules, they always âoeseeâ the surroundings â" how come itâ(TM)s only 82%? 95% for serious injuries sounds more plausible.

Not in any way trying to diminish work developers put into this effort, but with all due respect, how difficult can it be to re-write utilities such as cp, mv and rm?

I mean, I like my Tesla a lot, but there is no denying that they are expensive. Itâ(TM)s great to have more cheaper alternatives. Environmentalism aside, electric cars is an amazing technology.

AI does improve productivity. It is a fact. Whether companies use it as a pretext for larger layoffs is another matter.

This reminds me how Herman Cainâs Twitter account suddenly started tweeting again 2 weeks after his death. Anyway, I donâ(TM)t understand this patent at all. Training LLM on someoneâ(TM)s social media posts and likes seems like an absolutely obvious idea; and once you have that, what does it matter whether youâ(TM)re dead or not?

The bill defines knowledge to include what is "fairly implied on the basis of objective circumstances" -- in other words, what a reasonable person would conclude from how the account is being used. What a bizarre legal standard; very few people have any real life experience with judging kidâ(TM)s age by their posting history. If given such task, two âoereasonable personsâ could arrive to vastly different conclusions. Simply put, making this call is not a matter of reasoning, but of knowing vast amount of usage data which can then be used to draw conclusions based on statistical analysis. âoeReasonable personâ standard is simply inapplicable here.

That how economy works, with AI or without

Well, it is obviously way off-topic, but looking at this I can't help but wonder how soon it will be that Google become so powerful we'll be glad Microsoft is still around?

Just a thought...