I mean, I like my Tesla a lot, but there is no denying that they are expensive. Itâ(TM)s great to have more cheaper alternatives. Environmentalism aside, electric cars is an amazing technology.

AI does improve productivity. It is a fact. Whether companies use it as a pretext for larger layoffs is another matter.

This reminds me how Herman Cainâs Twitter account suddenly started tweeting again 2 weeks after his death. Anyway, I donâ(TM)t understand this patent at all. Training LLM on someoneâ(TM)s social media posts and likes seems like an absolutely obvious idea; and once you have that, what does it matter whether youâ(TM)re dead or not?

The bill defines knowledge to include what is "fairly implied on the basis of objective circumstances" -- in other words, what a reasonable person would conclude from how the account is being used. What a bizarre legal standard; very few people have any real life experience with judging kidâ(TM)s age by their posting history. If given such task, two âoereasonable personsâ could arrive to vastly different conclusions. Simply put, making this call is not a matter of reasoning, but of knowing vast amount of usage data which can then be used to draw conclusions based on statistical analysis. âoeReasonable personâ standard is simply inapplicable here.

That how economy works, with AI or without