Comment Re:I hope Kenneth collects on this (Score 1) 176
There is no such thing as punitive damages in Norway; Kenneth will only be able to sue for actual damages.
Submission + - New developments in NPG/Wikipedia lawsuit threat
Raul654 writes: "Last week, it was reported that the UK's National Portrait Gallery had threatened a lawsuit against an American Wikipedian for uploading pictures from the NPG's website to Wikipedia. The uploaded pictures are clearly in the public domain in the United States. (In the US, copies of public domain works are also in the public domain. UK law on the matter is unclear.) Since then, there have been several developments: EFF staff attorney Fred von Lohmann has taken on the case pro-bono; Eric Moeller, Wikimedia Foundation Deputy Director, has responded to the NPG's allegations in a post on the WMF blog; and the British Association of Picture Libraries and Agencies has weighed in on the dispute in favor of the NPG."
Submission + - Wikipedia Sued By National Portrait Gallery (wikimedia.org) 3
jpatokal writes: "The National Portrait Gallery of London is suing a Wikipedia user over his uploads of pictures of some 3,000 paintings, all 19th century or earlier and firmly in the public domain. Their claim? The photos are a "product of a painstaking exercise on the part of the photographer", and that downloading them off the NPG site is an "unlawful circumvention of technical measures". And remember, the NPG's taxpayer-funded mission is to "promote the appreciation and understanding of portraiture in all media [...] to as wide a range of visitors as possible"!"
Comment Re:This sounds familiar (Score 1) 209
Works under "Koipmi" are actually being considered for deletion as we speak -- see http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Template:Kopimi
Comment Public domain? (Score 2, Interesting) 482
Aren't the Olympic rings in the public domain, as they were created by Pierre de Coubertin (1863-1937) ?
Submission + - Citizendium after one year
Larry Sanger writes: "Citizendium, "the Citizens' Compendium" — a free, non-profit, ad-free, wiki encyclopedia with real names and a role for experts — has just announced that it's celebrating the one year anniversary of its wiki, an occasion for which I wrote a project report. Make up your own mind about whether "we've made a very strong start and an amazing future likely lies ahead of us." We have been the subject of a lot of misunderstanding, but we've still proven a lot, such as that a public-expert hybrid wiki is consistent with accelerating growth and leads to high quality, or that eliminating anonymity helps remove vandalism. We've got lots of initiatives and plans, and signs are good that we are starting into a serious growth spurt. Might the Web 2.0 umbrella be expanded to include real name requirements and roles for experts? It's looking that way."
Slashdot Top Deals
If it has syntax, it isn't user friendly.
