Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Submission + - Wikipedia Sued By National Portrait Gallery (wikimedia.org) 3

jpatokal writes: "The National Portrait Gallery of London is suing a Wikipedia user over his uploads of pictures of some 3,000 paintings, all 19th century or earlier and firmly in the public domain. Their claim? The photos are a "product of a painstaking exercise on the part of the photographer", and that downloading them off the NPG site is an "unlawful circumvention of technical measures". And remember, the NPG's taxpayer-funded mission is to "promote the appreciation and understanding of portraiture in all media [...] to as wide a range of visitors as possible"!"
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Wikipedia Sued By National Portrait Gallery

Comments Filter:
  • Confused... suing a user for uploading is different than suing the site.

    • by jpatokal ( 96361 ) *
      It's complicated -- the letter blames both, but the actual lawsuit is aimed against the user who did the uploading.

      Our client contacted the Wikimedia Foundation in April 2009 to request that the images be removed but the Wikimedia Foundation has refused to do so leaving our client with no option but to commence legal proceedings against you personally through the UK Courts. The purpose of this message is to inform you of the nature of our clientâ(TM)s claims against you and to give you an opportunit
  • Their photo art to have on their site or sell in books?
    The art might attract you to their web site and make you buy an art book, with cash flowing back to them?
    If you want pics, go to the National Portrait Gallery, take the pics and upload them to wikipedia.
    The age of the art is not the problem, or taking pics by outsiders? Its just using the pics they had made.
    Their could be a valid point, but what if the web site and gallery removes art from public display into storage and changes the web site to re

Put no trust in cryptic comments.