Just post the number of points they received and the total possible points - now everyone can decide on their own what grade that is

Don't worry, we're on it: China EMP First Strike Capability

You must be new here

Historically speaking, most humans are non-violent right up until you threaten their preferred protein abstraction layer. Vegans have tofu; carnivores have brisket; programmers have semicolons. Remove any of the three and the error handling gets energetic.

Not really.

The vast majority of attorney's get paid an hourly rate. Efficiency is not something they are interested in because it does not change their income and most of their work is not so time sensitive as to allow for rate increases if they can work faster. Why would anyone choose to do more work (in the same # of hours) for the same pay?

Reducing the firms overhead is where they can make more money - fewer associates, paralegals and admins - but if AI can't do the work better than the humans then it isn't worth the risk.

It does widen the gap for insider information and trading on it -- which does screw the little guy (or at least little guy traders). If you're a long term investor this really should not make a difference.

Worth noting: Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant wasn’t offline because it was unsafe to operate, but because Japan rewrote its nuclear rulebook after Fukushima. The post-2011 requirements are much stricter (earthquakes, tsunamis, backup power, security), and it’s taken years to get approvals. Reactor 6 got through first since it’s newer and already had upgrades.

The restart push is mostly about energy reality: Japan imports most of its fuel, LNG got expensive, and cutting emissions without nuclear is hard. Local opposition is still a factor though, especially given the seismic risks, which is why the rest of the plant is still years away from full operation — if it ever gets there.

SRV3 has been disabled while Google works on a simpler, more reliable caption system where every sentence is replaced with “ upbeat music ”.

Exactly. This isn’t a technology problem, it’s a management impulse-control problem.

We figured out decades ago that not every role needs a workstation that can land the space shuttle. Yet somehow with AI, we’ve collectively decided that the solution is to duct-tape it onto every workflow and hope “synergy” happens.

Tools only create leverage when there’s already something to leverage. Giving AI licenses to people whose jobs are already bounded by policy, approvals, or human judgment doesn’t create productivity—it just creates meetings about why productivity didn’t magically increase.

But targeted deployment requires understanding the work, trusting technical leadership, and saying “no” to vendors. Much easier to buy licenses in bulk, declare victory, and blame employees when the ROI slide stays blank.

The plan is to take the tariffs off in time for the economy to bounce back around election time. There is no rush to appease the masses until it is time for them to vote.

Awwww. These non-Americans are sooooo cute. Where were millimeters and kilograms when the Reich Fuhrer and Emperor were on your doorstep?

Granted, that sort of save likely wouldn't happen today, but we are like your uncle who lives off their championship playoff run in high school 50 years ago. Except we have nukes. So don't be Bill Hader at Conan's party and start something you can't finish. Oh and good luck with the new German military build-up!!

This means you

Xpeng claimed to have had around 3,000 orders for the vehicle

The current AI state of the art is that AI needs more human verification than humans do. :-)

1. pretty sure the list meant that, in the future, these jobs will be at risk. Not currently. But I'm to lazy to check
2. other aspect of this is if AI can produce something 100x faster than a human, and the human can review it faster than they could do it then it will take less humans

Seems like a human problem too. If AI could do a chunk of the work, and you had humans verifying, you would need fewer humans - hence vulnerability