Exactly. That's what I did when my (former) company did the latest round of downsizing.

I fell a little bad for the guys left behind to "do more with less", but I'm pretty happy about my mental health boost.

The fact that he got fired and had to spend a ton of time and effort fighting that firing demonstrates why so many people don't bother fighting it as strongly as they might otherwise.

It's the same argument against the ACAB claim"why aren't the so-called "good cops" fighting back against the 'bad apples'?"

Because they'll lose their income and get attacked,that's why.

One that is following fire code? In my experience data centres will have both pre-action sprinklers and a clean agent (Something like Inergen) Depending on the local fire code, tehy will will require sprinklers to protect the structure and any adjacent structures. The Inergen (or other clean agent) is there to protect the equipment, but the sprinklers will operate to protect the building if the clean agent fails to stop the fire.
Also, if the fire department found active fire after the power was cut, they'll use water to knock that fire out.

As far as I can tell, the bigest difference is additional bandwidth, and being deployed on additional RF frequencies that weren't previously available for use.

>"Eventually, the device could become standard equipment, just like air bags. " Will that "eventually" be before or after self-driving cars make it a pointless added expense to build into cars?

All of The Telus cell network is already Huawei. Has been for several years.
And Much of the Rogers western wireless networks well (though they are in the process of reverting to 100% Ericsson.)

>I>How do the different Pis have a "strength in communicating with an Arduino?"

Yes you can use USB on any computer to talk to an Arduino, but the PI also makes it easy to use I2C and/or SPI to talk to them.
An x86 or other boars without GPIO - not so much.

because the people doing it properly are seen as being too slow.

I think it's more because the people doing it properly cost more.

Shop "from the road" and get it a couple of days later, versus walk into a store and walk out in a few minutes with your stuff.

Non-citizens who want to take a vacation with our enemies

So, that includes Red Rross, MSF, and other NGO staff and volunteers who "took a vacation with our enemies" too?

There is a lot an advertiser can tell about you from the car you drive

There's a lot advertisers can tell about my company's cheap-ass fleet manager, maybe. That tells them nothing about me, though.

someone somewhere will mirror all the really important stuff.
As long as everyone doesn't think like that...

So does CBC...

>Do you believe rehabilitation is impossible or do you want revenge?

I don't believe that someone who commits mass murder can be rehabilitated, no. It isn't about revenge; it's about public safety.

Someone once pointed out that hoping a rapist gets raped in prison isn't a victory for his victim(s), because it somehow gives him what he had coming to him, but it's actually a victory for rape and violence. I wish I could remember who said that, because they are right. The score doesn't go Rapist: 1 World: 1. It goes Rape: 2.

What this man did is unspeakable, and he absolutely deserves to spend the rest of his life in prison. If he needs to be kept away from other prisoners as a safety issue, there are ways to do that without keeping him in solitary confinement, which has been shown conclusively to be profoundly cruel and harmful.

Putting him in solitary confinement, as a punitive measure, is not a victory for the good people in the world. It's a victory for inhumane treatment of human beings. This ruling is, in my opinion, very good and very strong for human rights, *precisely* because it was brought by such a despicable and horrible person. It affirms that all of us have basic human rights, even the absolute worst of us on this planet.