Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Well duh (Score 0) 139

Or the opposite. If they can detect which are bots and humans, most humans can detect this also.

However, you can easily claim that "all this is just bots" to discredit the opponent these days, if you're the one in control of the source. Heck its disinformation 101.

Now, I'm not saying being conscientious about the environment is bad. IIRC though, the climate accords are just sponsoring other countries and a not a good deal for the US. You can be better at caring for the environment without going through these accords.

Comment Re:This is going to be entertaining (Score 1) 691

The tens of thousand votes without a single one for trump seem absolutely like fraud to be honest. You can see the spikes on the official graphs too. Doesn't mean Trump should win or lose, and doesn't mean republican don't have fraud problems either.

I think each side just reads the news they want to believe and ignore things regularly or get mad. Except both side really lose when these things happen. I.e. the citizens lose every time as they lose faith in the process, news, country in general.

Comment Re:Time for Gitlab in Tor. (Score 1) 186

its the same problem for the whole internet. its just annoying when its stuff you like that gets censored.

Youtube is censored. Github is censored. Google search is censored. Bing is censored. Facebook is censored. Twitter is censored. Paypal and most payment providers censor too. Banks do it too. The list goes on and on and on.

Note that I believe it's fine to remove illegal materials. But youtube-dl isn't. When all services are owned by big corp and near monopoly with no way to find alternative, the censorship is pretty pretty bad.

Comment Re:But are you diverse? (Score 1) 199

A lot of the time ive seen things where you get +1 head count as a manager IF it contributes to diversity targets. The more head count you have the more "power" you have regardless of their skill, granted that your team can mostly deliver.

This also backs the rock star theory: If you have 2 rock stars that can bring 100x value, then you can afford 10 other head counts that don't really do much (yes there's caveats such as slowing the rock stars down I guess). Of course, the reality is more diluted than this.

Comment Re:Corporate wokeness is like my wokeness when hor (Score 1) 199

I agree with some of your points and disagree with some. (Hey that's a good start for a conversation isn't it?)

- Shortage of talent => yep, it's just like you say/

- Wokeness => this does affect employees if they're white and male, because you are less likely to be promoted due to your skin color and what's dangling between your legs, especially for leadership positions. While you mention money, promotions aren't just about money. It's about impact and passion too, especially with "rock stars" or anyone who actually likes and cares about the work they do.

- Money => No, money matters. At some point you gotta retire, because the older you get the slower you get (despite everyone telling you otherwise, it's a lie of course). If you work in the silicon valley / bay area, maybe you even dream about buying a house. Good luck with that if you make 200k/year. If you're making millions, yeah, 20%, who cares.

- Google, FB, etc. pay more than most companies and has perks. Check levels.fyi, its pretty accurate overall. I know plenty of people who would go work nearly anywhere if the pay was much higher. Again, if they all made millions already they wouldnt care. But they don't.

Comment Re:overpriced (Score 1) 62

I think its fine actually. the 3080 is great and most people will buy this. I probably will. That means only people that really want to pay way more for a little bit more performance will get the 3090 and that's fine.

It would bother me more if they didn't release a 3080 and your choice was 1500USD or get an old gen card ;-)

Comment Re:Its easy to 'innovate' (Score 1) 131

Imagine this:
Person A and Person B both work on solving a hard AI problem (i.e. "innovate").

Person B can see Person's A work and thoughts in addition to their own work.
Person A cannot see Person B's work.

Do you not think Person B has a huge advantage? This only works if both A&B share their work.

Slashdot Top Deals

panic: kernel trap (ignored)

Working...