It looks intelligent. The two things are absolutely not the same. Recounts exist as a tool to combat fraud. Not accepting the result of a clear result or after a recount and after the EC meets would be encouraging civil war (regardless of it is warranted or not). Otherwise there is a legal precedent for it and it is perfectly legitimate. This isn't how Trump answered in the debate. He shrugged and pretty much said we'll see. That said, I don't think the results will change. I've seen more intentionally misleading infographs and propaganda this cycle than ever before. Hillary and Donald's stances on election results aren't complicated, and at least in the case of Hillary are not hypocritical, and shouldn't take long to boil down to facts. I was not outraged by Donald's comments on election results in the debates. Like other things it seemed to be like he just hasn't thought about it yet.

Nobody got mad because his "invention" was being discredited, or even really cared if a 14 year old claimed he invented something he merely assembled. The reaction to show encouragement and support was to counteract the fact that this young boy might think the whole country would consider him a terrorist suspect for showing interest in electronics. I absolutely don't care if he is a boy wonder or not, lets not treat kids as terrorists because they are brown and like engineering.

Way to fight fallacy with fallacy. The point is that ISPs themselves generate no content. They are a pipe, and easily meet the description of a featureless service that T2 describes. I won't insult your intelligence, but who's interest is it in besides the ISPs to not be reclassified? It's seems obviously damaging to consumers and our infrastructure.