[...] the W3C cannot prevent companies from grafting DRM onto HTML. They do this through nonfree plug-ins such as Flash, and with nonfree Javascript code, thus showing that we need control over the Javascript code we run and over the C code we run. However, where the W3C stands is tremendously important for the battle to eliminate DRM. On a practical level, standardizing DRM would make it more convenient, in a very shallow sense. This could influence people who think only of short-term convenience to think of DRM as acceptable, which could in turn encourage more sites to use DRM. On the political level, making room for DRM in the specifications of the World Wide Web would constitute an endorsement in principle of DRM by the W3C. Standardization by the W3C could facilitate DRM that is harder for users to break than DRM implemented in Javascript code. If the DRM is implemented in the operating system, this could result in distribution of works that can't be played at all on a free operating system such as GNU/Linux.
You can easily get these for around US$10.
Google is your friend.
Don't be so cheap
Please see my comment in another branch of this thread.
Again, GNU mediagoblin is not the hosting service. gobblin.se is a hosting service that (allegedly) uses media goblin.The issue here is trust. How do I trust this website I am unfamiliar with? Would I start out by giving them money to buy the certificate that will show me that they can afford 6.00 to prove that they are somewhat trustworthy? Does that make sense to anyone here? Bueller?
Sorry about the confusion.
I am the owner of gobblin.se. Gobblin is the largest open MediaGoblin instance out there as far as I know.
I am also one of the core contributors to GNU MediaGoblin, and I'd like to show my work in exchange of feedback. That is why I spend money on public services. Like with other free services, the user is the product, I'm simply buying testers for the MediaGoblin application by providing free video hosting.
I do simply not have the motivation to buy a SSL certificate for gobblin.se, since I know whatever money I spend on it will go to a cause that I do not agree with. To me the CA system is fundamentally broken.
I believe there is a need for a MediaGoblin as a service provider. So far, gobblin.se is not it.
gobblin.se has a great potential to be a MediaGoblin as a service provider though since the owner is one of the people most familiar with the ins and outs of the application. The hurdle is simlpy that the owner has a stimulating day job which enables him to pay the server fees, thus creating little motivation to convert gobblin.se from what it is now to a MediaGoblin as a service provider.
Thank you for your time and sorry for being rude. If there's anything you'd like to talk about, contact me via http://wandborg.se/
An authority is a person who can tell you more about something than you really care to know.