I don't want to explore drop down bullshit. I just want to read the fricking summary and determine yeah or neah, and then move on. Who has time for this crap? It just makes it difficult to read and impairs the communication.

not actually accurate title here... the article states that Reid directly copied (mirrored) the site under www.therealsharonangle.com thus pretty much stealing the content. sounds like legitimate copyright violation actually, and nothing really sensational at all

that's great - unles you are left-handed in which case you are still hosed. I write creditably well with ball pen and I don't think that's the problem at all. On the other hand - I purposefully write by hand on paper regularly (with ball pen), forcing myself not to use a keyboard (which is the real source for deteriorated cursive handwriting...)

single bed, jackhammer. In the right hands this could be kinky. Instead, just sad.

This guy has a track record of following behind and just missing. The plan sounds like a mission statement rather than an actual plan, and the preconception that age has anything to do with innovation at all is crap thinking.

or hosed in a marriage.

"I'm sorry, I suck at sharing"

Frankly, I can't imagine asking someone to use their laptop. Establish some fucking boundaries.

That's exactly how David Miscavige writes and speaks. Remember - to a large degree he's not communicating to you, he is being consistent to the line he has already fed to his followers...

yes. So he is. How can you tell? His lips move...

This isn't about anti-religion. This is about specific entries and the deletion and alteration of entries (against published rules on wikipedia) to remove viewpoints considered undesirable by Scientology. Anti-religion is just a label and button to characterize and demonize the action emotionally. This is a necessary action to remove a disruptive behavior. They (Ch. of $cn) could have ADDED their viewpoint, or added references - but that was not the case, they delete opposing viewpoints, adding (IMHO erroneous) citations and data that is exclusively pro-$cn.

Frankly it couldn't happen to a nicer cult.

wait - stop - just kidding...
innovation (read adoption of what the surveyed herd wants and whoever we could purchase a look from, or failing that, what apple did last quarter, visually) in windows sucks.
The next step is to divorce the windows graphic interface from the underlying operating system, and make it a desktop for linux. Like apple. But with Linux.

Having worked extensively with both - there is a financial and criticality point where Linux falls short and Solaris pulls ahead. Google runs on linux. Ebay runs on Solaris and SUN hardware. Informational versus transactional. Financial companies where oversight and regulation meet serious financial risk, use invariably SUN and Solaris. Because it just works and the cost of support and hardware makes that worth it.