Comment Re: But (Score 1) 31
Trumps not a king, has never tried to be, nor will your constant bedwetting over it make it so.
You guys are hilarious.
Now you can move to NY and enjoy your upcoming Socialist Utopia.
Trumps not a king, has never tried to be, nor will your constant bedwetting over it make it so.
You guys are hilarious.
Now you can move to NY and enjoy your upcoming Socialist Utopia.
GFY
Last I heard, Apple sales haven't plummeted and thrown them into bankruptcy, so it sounds like they learned the lesson just fine: it's fine to show people ads. People might complain a little bit, but they won't stop buying. Cost is $0 and ad revenue is presumably more than $0.
If someone is stuck with your proprietary software and you aren't showing them ads, then you're leaving money on the table. What're they gonna do, fork it out?
If that's your cope for simply being wrong, good luck with that.
Strangely, the founding fathers didn't empower the judicial to overrule the executive everytime liberals got butthurt (ie 100% of the time).
Win an election, motherfucker.
That pesky Constitution!
Slashdot, where someone will write 250 words to tell you that a single word was redundant.
And feel smart about what they did.
Now gay men can go back to all that irresponsible behavior they practiced before HIV!
Next stop: monkey pox.
Yeah, I'm hung up on that too. You can come up with some outrageously huge numbers for mass and angular velocity, but once I multiply them by zero distance... I'm missing something.
the outer edge of the mass exceeding the speed of light
That intuitively makes sense, but I thought part of the black hole cheat is that it doesn't have an edge. I thought they were literally singularities, with a circumference of zero. Apparently not the case?
How a thing with a circumference of zero could meaningfully "rotate" is beyond me, but I thought this (and many other suspected properties of rotating black holes) was supposed to be beyond my ignorant layman understanding!
Good.
Then rsilverguns stalky bullshit would end.
I typed slashdot but somehow ended up apparently on bluesky?
An adversary can coerce a proprietary software producer to compromise the code. That's what we're going to see here.
An adversary cannot time-travel to when a protocol was invented, and compromise the protocol. (Though I guess the NSA can come kind of close to that, by "helping" as it's being developed, w/out the time-travel part.) That's what we're not going to see here.
Ergo, proprietary apps will remain unable to provide secure messaging, but secure messaging will remain available to people who want it.
Lol.
This is the heatwave that climatologists EXPLICITLY said has nothing to do with climate change?
You know, Oregon Public Broadcasting, that BASTION of right wing agitprop?
https://www.opb.org/article/20...
"Supreme Court is hopelessly corrupt" yes, when your sole yardstick is "doesn't do what I want it to".
Couldn't you just save everyone's time by having some sort of automated 'rsilvergun' comment bot that simply blames everything on Trump and Republicans?
You wouldn't have to waste time writing the same bullshit in every comment. Think how much time it would save you!
It's curious that they are talking about all the risks of extreme heat when the general consensus is that cold kills vastly more people.
Nearly all scientific surveys show that anywhere from 7x-20x people die from COLD than from HEAT.
Lancet:
https://www.thelancet.com/jour...
Cold : Heat 15:1 in US; 20:1 averaged across 13 countries.
SBN
https://www.sustainabilitybynu...
Cold:Heat 9:1
To be fair, NOAA's report had it at 1:4...but was based on MEDIA & WEB reports
https://journals.ametsoc.org/v...
Aren't we #followthescience on this one?
Why do you suppose the article and the insurers claims are about HEAT? It wouldn't be ideological ambulance chasing, would it?
"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain." -- The Wizard Of Oz