Comment Re:Another nail in astronomy's coffin (Score 4, Insightful) 66
We're spending hundreds of millions on cutting-edge telescopes while concurrently spending billions to blast view-destroying satellites into orbit. Sad.
A globally interconnected world is about cost equivalent with the 1 James Webb Telescope. The James Webb Telescope budget is ~10 Billion, has grown from $1.6 Billion and still expected to grow. Each Starlink launch of 60 satellites is at most ~90 million. That is a ~62 Million launch cost + $500K per satellite. Real launch costs are probably much lower since SpaceX is it's own customer. Assuming the maximum cost for the full 12,000 satellite installation then you would be correct. $18 Billion vs $10 Billion. However the costs for SpaceX are going down over time which is how they probably arrived at their $10 Billion estimate for total deployment. (I only checked Wikipedia).
I would like to see James Webb working since Hubble has been a true inspiration but I think a truly globally connected world is a much more amazing achievement. My other hope would be with the commercialization of space there are now opportunities to radically reduce the costs and increase the capabilities of orbital astronomy.
Comment Re:rotate the station. (Score 1) 158
Comment Re:orly? (Score 3, Insightful) 120
Comment Re:Simple plan (Score 1) 380
Comment Getting to them has always been the problem (Score 4, Insightful) 380
Comment Re:*yawn* (Score 1) 854
AMD Demos Llano Fusion APU, Radeon 6800 Series 116
Comment Re:Nukes (Score 2, Funny) 264
Comment Re:The best defense (Score 2, Funny) 264
Comment Re:It just goes to show (Score 1) 346
Comment Won't corporate transition to IPV6 free up IPV4? (Score 1) 425
Comment Re:Its always interesting to see these allegations (Score 2, Funny) 269
Comment Its always interesting to see these allegations (Score 3, Interesting) 269