LOL! No, it can't. Even shitty front-line support jobs. At $2 a hit, it's still cheaper to hire humans -- even Americans -- and you'll get dramatically better results.
And as compute gets faster, uses less power and more specialized, efficient hardware (i.e., accelerators) is created for AI, what do you think will happen to the cost per unit? And at the same time, what will happen to wages, including probably minimum wage?
AI takes a dishwasher's job. That dishwasher is now looking for a new job. He's a dishwasher so it's tough to compete with you in your white collar work, but he's half your age so he goes back to school, gets a degree, now he can compete.
If you're worried about a sea of dishwashers re-skilling and taking your job, you're probably not very good at what you do. I can certainly say I'm not concerned about that scenario in the slightest. People in those positions rarely have the resources to even reskill without significant assistance. If they did, they wouldn't be dishwashers to begin with unless they were already working while going to school. In which case this changed nothing.
Google Might Abandon [...]
Fetch me my feinting couch!
The other thing I've noticed is that Fedora fans are usually really stridently clueless but very loud.
Someone should tell Linus Torvalds.
It's [Fedora] not used in the data center (or shouldn't be!)
I think we should mention there is a Fedora Server.
"What man has done, man can aspire to do." -- Jerry Pournelle, about space flight