Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Highly political (Score 2) 141

The world of next generation high energy physics machines is highly political. There are plans for LHC luminosity and energy upgrades. The long delayed ILC (international linear collider) project, proposed for Japan. Competing designs for a lower energy circular lepton collider (maybe China) to be upgraded to a very high energy hadron collider. Laser and beam driven plasma accelerators - neither anywhere near practical yet. CLIC, Muon collider, VLHC, etc.

There really are two issues: Is it worth ~10B$ to build the next generation high energy physics machine, and if it is, which of the many machines should be built. With machine development likely to take a generation, people on any project know that success of another will doom their machine.

Neither question is easy to answer. There is no clear way to measure the value of fundamental physics measurements. The likely technological value is zero, though spin-offs can be valuable.

To me personally, learning about the most basic structure of the universe from high energy physics, or astrophysics is valuable, even if it has no imaginable application. I view learning about the universe as one of the goals of civilization, not a means.

Comment Need to categorize drones (Score 1) 239

I think that very lightweight drones that do not represent a hazard including through aircraft ingestion only need to be regulated in terms of noise and privacy ordinances. As the size / hazard of the drones goes up, the regulations should be tighter. A drone the size of a manned aircraft should operate under the same regulations.

Comment Re:A law is only a law until it's proven wrong (Score 1) 248

Scientists spend lots of time trying to find ways in which our current understanding of physics is wrong. This is generally done by doing measurements that are in some way fundamentally new: new conditions, higher accuracy experiments, measuring new things. LHC looks at interactions at very high energy. Low temperature experiments look for unexpected effects at extremely low energies. Astrophysical measurements look at effects in very strong gravity, or very large distances.

Electromagnetism has been measured over an enormous range of scales. We see it a sub-atomic scales and extreme field strengths in particle collisions. We see it in very slowly changing, very low density fields like galactic magnetic fields. At SLAC we looked at high intensity fields at modest energies when we scattered gamma rays from high intensity lasers to look for (and found) nonlinear effects predicted by EM theory.

The problem with the EM drive is that there is nothing unusual about it. Its just a microwave cavity with modest fields at modest frequencies. These sorts of fields (and much stronger and weaker ones) are regularly used in a wide variety of experiments. If they use Maxwell's equations there can be no effect because the equations locally conserve momentum. There is no coupling to dark matter at this level, much more sensitive experiments have been done. There is no reason to think it will work. The measured thrust is very small, easily explained by a wide range of other normal effects including tilting of the apparatus as experimenters walked around the room.

Doing the experiment in space will not help. There are a lot of other forces at play - solar wind, light pressure, out-gassing. They would have to demonstrate a substantial velocity change (probably 100s of m/sec). which would required a lot of power for a long time .

Comment Don't trust the FBI's ability (Score 2) 367

Even if I trusted the FBI to only use the information for the public good and in accordance with the law, I don't trust their ability to secure the information. Whatever mechanism is provided to the FBI to access secured data risks being transferred to some non-trusted party.

One the most important lessons from Snowdon was that even the NSA cannot protect its own secrets. How can I possibly be convinced that the FBI will be able to do so? Will Llooyds insure them for say $1T against a data breech? Or how about in the event of a breech, the directory and the top 1000 managers are executed (regardless of their personal guilt)? Are they *that* sure? If they aren't that sure, then I'm not sure enough to trust them. Imagine the damage that could be done by a person or government with access to virtually all information in the US .

Comment Re:Interesting to quantify if possible (Score 1) 321

That is certainly true, but a different problem. Too many people will create resumes targeted at specific jobs in the hopes of getting an interview, even though they don't have even the basic skills required. I don't know if there is any statistical difference in how often women do this.

Comment Re:Interesting to quantify if possible (Score 1) 321

I know a number of women in tech careers and they quite enjoy them. Its true that some people like to pick on nerds, true nerds couldn't care less what "normasl" think of them. Some fields like physics and math seem to have done better than others at attracting women and it would be interesting to know why.

Comment Interesting to quantify if possible (Score 5, Interesting) 321

It would be very interesting to find a way to quantify bias in media. I don't know if its possible, but it sounds hard. OTOH, self-driving cars sounded hard as well and they seem to be becoming a reality.

Last time I posted a req for a high level RF engineer, I got ~100 applications from men and 2 from women. If only for selfish reasons I'd like more women learning the skills that I need.

I've been working in a high tech field for a quarter century now and I do see a problem the way women are treated in many places. The problems are not universal, and there is a lot of variety, but it exists. It difficult to separate cause and effect but more information would be helpful.

Comment Re:Come the fuck on (Score 4, Insightful) 366

Agreed! The minor changes I would make (and do for my own few TB of files).

Have a script the runs the backup. I use rsync on linux.
Make two copies, one that mirrors, one that just adds files.
Use two backup disks, always have one at a remote location (your work) so you don't lose data in a house fire.

If it is a single command (my is "backup") then its easy to remember to do every week.

I actually have 3 backups. One at home. Two at different work sites that I cycle through. I do my backups from a linux machine that doesn't provide write access to my main windows machines. That makes me a little more resistant to hacks (since they would have to hack two different OSs.

Slashdot Top Deals

In 1750 Issac Newton became discouraged when he fell up a flight of stairs.