Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Censorship

FunnyJunk Sues the Oatmeal Over TM and "Incitement To Cyber-Vandalism" 390

eldavojohn writes "You may recall from last week the news item concerning FunnyJunk's extortion ... er ... threat of defamation lawsuit against The Oatmeal highlighting a fairly pervasive problem of rehosting content — in this case web comics. Instead of expediting a payment of $20,000 to FunnyJunk, Matthew Inman of The Oatmeal decided to crowd source the money (with 8 days left he has only garnered 900% of his goal) and donate it to charity after sending a picture of it to FunnyJunk. Charles Carreon (the man who has FunnyJunk) has made statements of Inman saying 'I really did not expect that he would marshal an army of people who would besiege my website and send me a string of obscene emails.' In an interview Carreon says 'So someone takes one of my letters and takes it apart. That doesn't mean you can just declare netwar, that doesn't mean you can encourage people to hack my website, to brute force my WordPress installation so I have to change my password. You can't encourage people to violate my trademark and violate my twitter name and associate me with incompetence with stupidity, and douchebaggery. And if that's where the world is going I will fight with every ounce of force in this 5'11 180 pound frame against it. I've got the energy, and I've got the time.' Well it appears that Carreon has filed suit over these matters alleging 'trademark infringement and incitement to cyber-vandalism.' Speaking of douchebaggery, Charles Carreon curiously fails to mention that he first incited all of his users to harass The Oatmeal anyway they can which they dutifully did. One last juicy detail is that Carreon is also suing the National Wildlife Federation and the American Cancer Society to which Inman's crowd sourced money is going. Luckily, Inman's lawyer appears to be fully competent and able to address Carreon's complaints."

Comment release the spec (Score 1) 327

One thing that is really holding Thunderbolt back (in my opinion) is the holding back of a Thunderbolt spec. The claim at NAB was that the SDK would come out this year, but apparently they only meant it would come out to a select group of companies making high end equipment directed at graphics specialists. I have lots of ideas for what I'd do with PCIe over displayport, but there's no way for me as an individual to get the SDK, and there's no contact person at Intel to email to even ASK how I'd get it. If it's anyone's fault the technology doesn't get adopted, it's Intel's.

Comment Re:DreamHost (Score 1) 456

Some pluses and minuses from my Dreamhost experience:

+ They had an insane deal that I picked up a year ago for St. Patrick's Day where you could buy a year for $10.

- The year is almost up, and they want $10.95 per month, unless I get locked into a multi year plan. You have to buy 2 years to get down to the price of bluehost.

+ They do have a lot of the benefits mentioned by the parent, which I have certainly taken advantage of. I was even able to install a newer version of Python on my account. Access to ssh has made deploying with something like fabric awesome.

- It took them a long time to support Django. I took me a few weeks of messing of reading blogs and wikis and asking questions on email lists before I could get Django on fast CGI working.

+ Of course, a month after I got it set up they release passenger scripts to make Django deployment work easily, so they've improved in that area. It works for Ruby on Rails if you're into that too.

- They are often very slow. Sometimes I send email from my domain and it takes 4 times as long as it takes to send email from my Gmail. Also, my site is often slow to load, and it has been down a few times.

+ If I want to switch to VPS and stay with Dreamhost they are way, way over priced if their VPS is anywhere as slow as their regular hosting.

Overall, they're not terrible, but I find it questionable whether they're worth the price for the level of commitment they're asking.

Comment Re:No flash support (Score 3, Insightful) 1713

It is a feature because it means an insecure plugin that security experts have said will cause more remote exploits than any other software this year is banned from the OS. Webkit already supports HTML 5. Those sites need to upgrade their technology if they don't want to endanger their customers.
Mars

Mars Images Reveal Evidence of Ancient Lakes 128

Matt_dk writes "Spectacular satellite images suggest that Mars was warm enough to sustain lakes three billion years ago, a period that was previously thought to be too cold and arid to sustain water on the surface, according to research published today in the journal Geology. Earlier research had suggested that Mars had a warm and wet early history but that between 4 billion and 3.8 billion years ago, before the Hesperian Epoch, the planet lost most of its atmosphere and became cold and dry. In the new study, the researchers analysed detailed images from NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, which is currently circling the red planet, and concluded that there were later episodes where Mars experienced warm and wet periods."

Comment Worse than DRM (Score 5, Interesting) 231

"He does propose a solution to the difficulty of how to compensate artists, artisans, and programmers in a digital era: a content database that would be run by some kind of government organization: "We should effectively keep only one copy of each cultural expression—as with a book or song—and pay the author of that expression a small, affordable amount whenever it's accessed." According to the article, Lanier wants a pay per use SOA, the very strategy Microsoft has been trying to implement as a strategy for years. It's the ultimate greed based mashup of DRM and cloud technology possible, all mandated by the government. I wouldn't be surprised if this happened in the near future.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Laugh while you can, monkey-boy." -- Dr. Emilio Lizardo

Working...