Well wtf does he mean by speedtest then? If he's doing it from his phone or wifi connected laptop, then it's going to reflect the speed of his wifi. If he's doing it from his router, and complaining that the speedtest is wrong because his wifi is slower than his router uplink, I'd say that's a statement only a doofus would make.
"Now I'm currently using fiber at the speed fast than my wifi router, which makes my speedtest always wrong."
oh please expand on this - this is gunna be hilarious
Prosecuting arsonists doesn't unwind time, bro.
Well, it falls to a jurisdiction in which there is a high chance of selective regulatory oversight/enforcement, given the conflict of interest with Trump's family vested interest in prediction markets.
"I immediately notice an issue."
Wow they must really regret not working with a person as smart as you. (Honestly, slashdot is chock full of wannabes these days)
"Hell yeah, a credit card!" - people I don't get
These platforms are starting to let people bet on wildfire activity. What a fun way of incentivizing arsonists.
You're conflating your emotions with facts, in a field you very likely know very little about.
Always anonymous, always cowards.
Insane Clown Posse, is that you?
Once they realized you'd pay the hire price, if the fees are gone, the businesses are just going to go 'yummy more money for me'.
This is dumb shit. Many stores around me explicitly charge you the difference if you pay by credit card to cover the service fee.
I have never had my debit card compromised. Ever. The fact that it's a direct line is what makes it not usable to buy things online, etc (generally). But it's very nice to use in person - I like that when I spend money, I'm actually spending it and not creating debt. (Don't get me wrong, I always pay off my credit card bills every month, which are not trivial sums
Credit cards, on the other hand - we all pay for the insurance. It's not really the banks problem, its a problem that you have protection for because you pay for it.
"Just give me 1% in cash"
That's still money that comes from somewhere. Like
"An opt-out setting that quietly ships settings data off-device is exactly the sort of thing that adds to administrators' workloads rather than lightening them."
Fine, but there's *tons* of them. This is a drip in an ocean. The opposite, settings you need to turn on are also fucking huge depending on the corperate environment it's used in. I mean, fiddling over one setting on a product with a user base as huge and diverse as Windows is nitpicking imo.
Places that have to deal with this are setup to be proactive about the larger problem set.
If Machiavelli were a hacker, he'd have worked for the CSSG. -- Phil Lapsley
