Movies are not real
Who cares if a non real story is story tale-ed by an AI created movie or a movie that costed a fortune to make and the people involved got paid bread crumbs?
Thinking about Avatar, Lord of the Rings of Game of Thrones.
Perhaps because you are just an idiot?
The base price is: zero.
And it mounts on your computer like an ordinary drive.
Perhaps you should read what bullshit you copy pasted.
The spacing of wind turbines on land does not equal to "required land".
All the land around wind turbines is full with crops.
Actually share holders have no say at all in operations.
Launching sattelites, or doing a test launch to test the performance or failure of reentry and safe return and landing stages or boosters, does not require a launch window.
China considers itself a democracy.
The democracy with the biggest parliament in the world.
The last genocide was hundreds if years ago, under Genghis Khan and Kublai Khan.
So no one knows what you are talking about.
The big reason number one is that an South African yahoo immigrated into the US.
And that some other bozzos have a big pile of money to spent
Most that is "relevant" in clothing, in China and most parts of Asia: is made by robots.
One or few more posts above, is the real truth: people are ready to buy cheap junk. Does not matter what the cheap junk is about. And especially in low cost wage countries, they are ready to produce and sell the cheap junk
If you would go to those places, and buy ordinary goods, they top notch quality, like Amy other top quality good on the rest of the planet.
Airport landing lights can actually be extremely strange.
I live close to FRA port. Yesterday was a festival one side, and airport other side. So I walked around on the roof and filmed both sides.
Two planes coming in, then 3 then 4. The lights pop out of nowhere. Obviously it is just distance and eye sight and camera sensitivity
Not absolutely wrong but absolutely correct, moron. Name called. Why is it called "name calling" when I call you a moron? That is not a name, that is a honourific.
A 1C battery is a 1C battery, regardless of how large it is.
Yes. But the charge is not measured in Volts mut in Amper-Hours. Or for easier use: milli Ampere Hours, or mAh.
I can make you a single cell 1V "accumulator" (as battery has a slightly different meaning), with what ever total charge I want. Farking idiot.
I can make you one that charges from a damn 110V 20A outlet, converted to 1.1V DC: for a million of years to get full.
Stupid idiot. What was your name? Ah, stupid swillden
Indeed.
And wind does not cost much crop land, as the pillars of the turbines only use very little land.
Solar can be everywhere, it is only put on crop land: if all agree the land usage has to change away from crops - for what ever reason.
And putting solar on crop land only makes sense for large installations anyway. Most installations are on buildings
Then again: the percentage of land any country uses as crop land is extremely low. If some usage is diverted away from that, there is usually a reason.
for years before anyone knew where on the map the Strait of Hormuz was.
I guess you underestimate the education regarding geography on the world.
Well, perhaps I over estimate it.
It is only relevant how much wind and solar did in Germany.
Because of nukes and such
Does not matter what the pilots seeing them knew about the projects.
With full speed they are hardly 2x as fast as a passenger plane. The F-117 was not even that fast. And: they look like air planes. They do not look like "strange objects".
And fighter jets already existed. So they only would look "strange", when you can visualy identfy strange details. No one would throw a second glance at a fighter jet too far away to identify with naked eyes, but that behaves like an ordinary fighter jet: flying fast in one direction.
You charge all of the cells in a battery in ()parallel(?), so unless your input power is limited by something,
The correct word would be simultaneously. As plenty of them are chained in serials, and do not charge parallel.
charge time is dominated by how long it takes a single cell to go from empty to full. if one wants to nitpick, that is correct.
However the battery is full when the amount of nominal charge came from the plug into the battery. Ooops.
So a smaller battery charges much faster, as the amount of energy to put into it, is much smaller.
Hence: the trend to smaller lighter batteries, that in turn support slightly lighter engines/brakes and an over all frame, and in the end lead to just minimal range loss, but charge in half the time than the previous battery generation. With similar driving performance as in speed, reliability etc.
You morons are not even utterly uneducated how stuff works, hence your stupid idea about "all cells charge in parallel" - you are also completely out of the loop how stuff works on the other side of the planet.
The best way to avoid responsibility is to say, "I've got responsibilities."
