> Also, why was it even possible to fall back to such a weak keylength?
Key length is likely something perfectly normal, What this article is talking about is entropy, which is a measure of how truly random your RNG is.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Basically everyone uses predictable RNG generators that always output same numbers for a given seed. The security of this depends on providing truly random seed that cannot be predicted. Im guessing hardware wallet has not enough external inputs to generate reliably random data on software level (eg linux uses keyboard, mouse and other devices input as sources, which this device mostly lacks), resulting in something like "this seed is 1000 bits long, but all but 40 of them are 0s"

https://www.reuters.com/legal/...

The article for some reason links to paywalled thetimes.com instead of bbc...

BBC link for those interested: https://www.bbc.com/news/artic...

Plane landed after about 4h24m in the flight, so they were likely about ~2h out of departure airport at the moment of the decision. It would still be ~6h to Spain at the time.

Which likely means among others most "casual" long term investors. I remember reading that Musk was negotiating faster inclusion of SpaceX into indexes like S&P 500 (without a usual wait time). Once the company is included in the index managers of all the funds tied to that index will need to buy the stocks whether they like it or not, likely rising the prices. A lot of retirement and other long term savings are tied into funds like these so A LOT of normal people will get the exposure.

Clearly OnlyOffice tried to run around AGPL terms by forcing any derivative work to use their logo while simultaneously refusing to allow its use (trademark). They tried to do this by using clause 7(b):
> you may (...) supplement the terms of this License with terms: (...)
> b) Requiring preservation of specified reasonable legal notices or author attributions in that material or in the Appropriate Legal Notices displayed by works containing it

Unfortunately for them logo is not legal notice nor atribution, so they basically created a "further restriction" under the terms of AGPL, which is allowed to be dropped
> If the Program as you received it, or any part of it, contains a notice stating that it is governed by this License along with a term that is a further restriction, you may remove that term.

> Yesterday, 73 per cent of voters approved of a government proposal to enshrine the use of cash in the Swiss Constitution
> It will now be amended to include the Swiss Franc as the country’s currency, and the Swiss National Bank will be legally required to make sure there will always be enough cash money available.
source: https://brusselssignal.eu/2026...

"Her social media included TikTok’s featuring streams from the popular game Roblox, say law enforcement."

Moving pricing source outside the jurisdiction doesn't change anything, since simply using it will be illegal act of collusion and landlords for the obvious reason of property location will remain within it.. You can always hope to remain undetected, but this is likely high risk approach to take - all it takes is a single disgruntled employee sharing that secret source.

1. Algorithm designers collects all the data. At present they have (almost) perfect data as they get actual transactional prices from their customers. This alone gives them huge information advantage against renters. With public information you generally only see offer prices and how long the place is listed (often even with some missing location details)

2. Algorithm ensures consistent interpretation of data and factors that affect pricing. When its human interpreting data you will have inconsistencies, eg how far does some undesirable neighbour location affects prices, how long does listing remaining available is a problem, do you think that transactional price matched the offer etc.

3. The sad truth is that this whole thing is about making market less efficient in raising housing prices. Given terrible under supply and importance of the housing need for people even simple, stupid algorithms like "match neighbouring landlords plus a bit" will lead to price increases. Its just that automatic systems remove fear about taking bad risk and allow for more aggressive strategies.

Those cant really be separated. AI is just a roundabout way for saying "algorithm to decide price" and there is no difference if that algorithm is decided in a shady backroom during a meeting of representatives or by some high tech company that collects all the data. If multiple parties use same algorithm to decide price they will arrive to same conclusion, resulting in fixed pricing.

Perhaps you should have read TFA:

"While the liability verdict stands, there was some positive news for the ISP as well. The Court overturned the lower court’s decision on how damages should be calculated. A new trial will determine the appropriate amount."

from https://support.spotify.com/us...:

"We calculate streamshare by tallying the total number of streams in a given month and determining what proportion of those streams were people listening to music owned or controlled by a particular rightsholder.

Contrary to what you might have heard, Spotify does not pay artist royalties according to a per-play or per-stream rate; the royalty payments that artists receive might vary according to differences in how their music is streamed or the agreements they have with labels or distributors."

From TFA:

This seems like those fees are still remaining extremely high. EU caps fees at 0,2% for debit and 0,3% for credit and both VISA and MasterCard are happy to work here.