China and Russia are running interpol now thanks to Trump's incompetence/treason. Shocker that Interpol now thinks using compromised AV is cool.

I'm very concerned that all these statue removals will lead to poke-stop removals. rampant destruction of pikachu habitat!

Yeah, this -
> Obama Administration members used unmasking on political figures
is by definition impossible. There's no reason to unmask if you already know who the colluding scumbag is. So that didn't happen.
So stupid to make up lies that are that logically inconsistent.

Yah, you can either just short out the end turns on a three phase linear synchronous motor and get drag proportional to speed or you can have a secondary set of magnets dragging past aluminium fins, or likely both. Both surprisingly effective braking methods, and not magic.

to try at home, get a NeFeB magnet, a half inch aluminum plate, and try to move one past the other.

If Phil Ivey is requesting something, it's different from a rando requesting something.
51% of the time if Phil Ivey requests something crazy it's cause he thinks he has an edge.
If casinos or other players don't know that or proceed anyway, they are suckers and genuinely deserve to lose.

You can always compute nested sets from adjacent lists like people are suggesting if the entire adjacent list is on one cloud or system, but you can lose a whole branch if you lose a link instead of only losing that one link if one supplier is non-conforming or offline. It's not fake or fluff, it's error minimizing.

I've never heard of him. he has no reputation.

there's 4.12 million miles of road in the US. The ring road around Iceland is like 850 miles.

The modern epistemic culture of research, like all cultures, is the apex of the form and cannot be improved upon &tc. From this glorious pinnacle surely there could be no blind spots, epistemological or actual. Everything I see through the perfect lens of the culture I belong to belongs to the culture I belong to, from which even an illiterate buffoon could extrapolate .... a swan.

What you just described - making a new product by slightly altering an existing one - happens in the food world all the time with no legal issues at all.
What you didn't describe but probably intended to - copying a bread recipe - also happens all the time with no legal issues at all. When either of these things happen, the baker is thrilled. Some of them actually publish books helping you infringe on their own products!
In short, your metaphor fails to map to the primary event in every way possible. Please stick to car metaphors in the future. It's traditional.

This isn't the USA. This is Massachusetts. We have lots of traffic circles up here and generally know how to use them.

Everybody thinks they know what restaurants do.
This is why so many otherwise smart people get into the restaurant business and then fail.

Forget the word restaurant.
Instead, think highly competitive, low volume, high mix, low margin, short lead-time manufacturing.
Think highly perishable inventory.

Accurate inventory, accurate predictions of future demand, and data driven product design make all the difference between success and failure.

Data collection and analysis is what really successful restaurants do. Or did you really think it was like Top Chef?

The purpose of a patent is "To promote the progress of science and useful arts". (Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution)

Since sitting on a patent cannot possibly promote progress of any sort, doing so ~should~ invalidate the patent.

Facts are slippery little things. Given any restrictions you like I can construct a test that guarantees the electoral result I prefer. In fact, it would be difficult not to, even by accident.