I'm sorry, maybe there is something that I'm not understanding here, but I do not believe that you answered my question.
You don't explicitly say this, but I am going to make an assumption from context that you are trying to lead me to what you believe is an obvious conclusion that Rice is the only possible person with access to this information and therefore must have been the source of the leak. If this is your logic and the only evidence that you are providing, it's easily falsifiable since more than one person (Susan Rice) knew that she requested that the names be unmasked, and more than one person had access to the intelligence report (e.g. members of the intelligence agency/agencies briefing her). Certainly, it's possible that she leaked classified information, but it's just as possible that anyone else with access to this information leaked classified information. I apologize in advance if I'm putting words mouth here, I'm just trying to find meaning in your response. Did I read this wrong?
If I'm reading this right, what actual evidence exists suggesting that Susan Rice leaked classified information in this case (again, remembering that there is no equivalence between unmasking and leaking)?