If we pretend we can control climate, which decades weather would you prefer to emulate? NB 1880 was shit.

At the moment we are running (poorly) a process without a target.

The factory is designed as a system assembly plant rather than a cell fabrication facility. Peak will receive sodium-ion cells, manufactured to its specifications by Chinese suppliers, and assemble them

The factory is designed as a system assembly plant rather than a cell fabrication facility. Peak will receive sodium-ion cells, manufactured to its specifications by Chinese suppliers, and assemble them

FTFA

Children have flexible brains. The OS's mentioned are fairly similar so far as UX. To be honest how much time does a child interact with the OS directly rather than apps?

All they are doing is unloading pallets of cells from a truck, wiring them up, and putting them in cabinets. Woo hi tech.

RWE initially paid a total of approximately $1.26 billion for its U.S. offshore wind leases—$1.1 billion for its New York Bight lease in 2022 plus $163 million combined for California and Louisiana leases—before striking a $1.22 billion exit settlement with the U.S. government in August 2026 to relinquish them

So put your pearls down, this just resets the clock. Or whina nad stamp your feet. No skin off my nose.

Your lame sig is wrong, woke is an adjective.

Spacex $1.7T

Try the climate denial page.

He's right expertise does not get you anywhere in itself. Of course if you are an expert you probably have some obscure references to back your statements up.

If you look at the climate change denial page you can see the hive mind in action.

Not for electricity generation in general in the USA over the long term. There was a small bump last year. https://ourworldindata.org/ele...

There may be some new plant proposed, there are 3 that might be built according to https://globalenergymonitor.or...

Of course unreliable energy enthusiasts can cherry pick when they crow about these stats, quietly forgetting the cold dark calm days in winter.

Splitting short term noisy records up into arbitrary linear segments is, statistically, a rather dodgy thing to do. The most reliable is linear fit the first half, and the second half. This of course gives nothing like a factor of 2.

Straight line fit calendar years 1993-2014 2.6 mm/y 2015-2023 3.6 mm/y

https://skepticalscience.com/V... says up to 2010 was 2.83 mm/year, man it must have dropped a lot to get to 2 up to 2015.

So they used a fake baseline to make the current number sound scarier. If you look at the actual data it is bleeding obvious that the gradient is not twice as big after 2015. I'll leave to run the numbers, I know you won't. https://www.star.nesdis.noaa.g...