1. TV's where if you don't enable them and keep it connected to the Internet , they don't turn on the HDMI ports. All you can do is watch OTA TV
2. Cellular modems in TV's so you can't bypass ads sent through the cellular modem.
3. All sales final return policy
4. Potted and sealed electronics with tamper grids.
4. DMCA lawsuit if you modify the TV and they find out.

I guess at this point people won't but TV's anymore.

You would see nothing. 92 pairs is an extremely small number of particles. Even if a small fraction of the energy were converted into visible light (e.g., through secondary interactions with surrounding matter), the total number of visible photons produced would be far below the threshold required for the human eye to perceive a flash.

The original copyright term in the United States, established by the Copyright Act of 1790, was
14 years from recording the title, with a14-year renewal option if the author was still alive. It applied only to maps, charts, and books. This was later extended to 28 years in 1831, plus renewal.

Make the renewal fee 20% of all future profits.

Record companies losing in the short term:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhBx0nuYEZU

Record companies lobbying congress for DMCA V 2.0 because it ain't over yet:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWb07Xh4jaA

Will state something in their press releases like: We will vigorously defend against this/s

And Ubiquiti has some of the best most flexible router firmware. It would suck to see them not be able to sell in the US.

They will try to get things like the save act passed. If the save act fails to pass, watch out, because things will get scary during and after the midterms. If they lose the midterms, they'll just seize power with a physical coup.

if you have dual citizenship. But the pesky US tax law which taxes all foreign income, and the dual reporting of all of your taxes to both the US and the country you emigrate to make yearly tax preparation a nightmare.

because the AI thinks he's incompetent.

I think the AI would be fired at that point.

What's the likelihood it will be preempted by one of Trumps' executive orders?

Robots can't solve technical issues on the production line. AI might however.

1 . California? Not Musk's first choice. They'll mostly vote Democrat. All that will do is swell the democratic base in Austin. You're also going to have a tough time getting [most] Californians to move to Texas unless they like hot sticky weather and the Republican values.

2. H-1B? Not with Trumps $100,000.00 visa fee. But Musk's upside to this is that they can't vote.

3. No engineers or white collar employees, just blue collar workers and AI. (Musk's wet dream). Blue collar workers are for the most part Republican.

They will continue to be annoying whether they are AI or human generated. They only care about getting you to buy their [a lot of times ] shitty product. The only real solution is to either mute them or block them. Most of what is sold via advertising is a solution looking for a problem, and usually requires a high markup in the price in order to pay for the advertising costs. A lot of advertising triggers people to buy the advertised product in a "myopic" buyer-to-advertiser relationship where the buyers typically don't do the homework to see if there are other more cost efficient options.

Good examples of advertisers doing this are insurers advertising insurance on certain news television networks which isn't necessary, or with so many exclusions in the policy that you would have a hard time getting any money from them if you posted a claim, or cleaning services which offer a $20.00 first time visit, but then charge an above-market rate and lock you into a multi-year contract. Or flooring and carpet contractors advertising nationwide which charge way above market rates.

Advertising costs money. Those businesses which choose an expensive advertising campaign have to pay for it somehow. Stick with local businesses which do minimal advertising and you will get a better deal.

Midterm elections? What midterm elections! Those were eliminated.

Of course the party in power can always vote to eliminate the filibuster provided enough money changes hands or senate leadership is voted out and replaced with someone who will gut the filibuster.