Google is not selling stories written by others. They, and the other companies in AI, are creating AI tools that learn from existing materials and are allowing users to create new works using them.
I am not sure I am happy with the extension of copyrights to any use of the material. I am also not happy with the idea that the author of a work has to authorise every different type of use of their material. A copyright should, in my opinion, be about who is allowed to make copies of a work and then sell it, or license it, to others. I think it is a (primarily American) mistake to give authors the rights to decide how licensees are allowed to use the works licensed to them. I do not think this should be a principle of copyright.
Donâ(TM)t get me wrong, I think authors need some protection. But I think what we are now seeing is greed masquerading as principle.
I am sure that folks here would be unhappy if Microsoft started insisting that Xbox games were for private use and any esports (e.g. Forza) required a separate license.