http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10...

Better version

It's just money. What's a few hundred (400) billion dollars? I mean, what else are we going to spend it on? Education? Infrastructure? This is clearly the best use of the funds.

Class III is all surface waters. It covers fish toxicity / breeding / etc. as well.

Adding a limit for otherwise unregulated chemicals is not increasing pollution. Raising a limit for a chemical that was regulated artificially low (and not based on toxicity) is fine.

The linked talks about benzene a bunch. The proposed lowers the limit for Class III (recreation water) and increases it from 1.18ug/L to 2 ug/L for Class I (Drinking water). EPA limit for drinking water is 5 ug/L, for reference.

http://www.dep.state.fl.us/water/wqssp/classes.htm
https://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/table-regulated-drinking-water-contaminants#one
https://depnewsroom.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/hhc-criterion-comparison.pdf

Whoopsiedoodles.

https://www.reddit.com/r/DNCle...

https://www.reddit.com/r/DNCle...

Direct links to emails in here.

This is nonsense. There was a warrant, but the guy wanted the court to find that it was too broad. The warrant was for anyone who was a registered user at Playpen (the kiddie porn website in question). They didn't know it was his computer before they hacked it, they just knew it was the terminal used to log in to Playpen. He thought this was too broad.

From the court finding: "NIT warrant described the places to be searched - activating computers of users or administrators that logged into Playpen - and the things to be seized - the seven pieces of information obtained from those activating computers - with particularity."

The court finding states that this super broad warrant did not violate the 4th. Can we please discuss that?

Shouldn't it be, "Some extreme weather linked to climate change?"

The title implies that extreme weather causes climate change, no?

Apple store genius: Can I help you?
Any sensible human: No you cannot.

will ever be connected to the internet directly. AV equipment does not need its own OS.

I think I speak for everyone when I say, "Get fucked, FBI and other law enforcement and intelligence agencies."

If it's not both warranted and public, you shouldn't be able to get it in the first place.

Other political type stuff that should be accepted:

Police use clone DNA found at crime scene to recreate offender's facial features.
Congress requires ISPs to manually censor slashdot posts.
President to DM fifth ed. D&D campaign in the oval office, accepting player applications.

I'd like to think this is true, but are there any patents to back up their tech?

How do they manage to get by with less material than is generally required, and have they been able to show (through data reproduction) that their techniques get the same results with less?

Would we allow programming of robot lawyers to omit or twist information? If not, they are hardly lawyers at all...

True enough-- though typically, one does not have the option of flying outside of 'visual line of site' unless they have a real time camera/transmitter on the device and a portable receiver. I see them as very different sorts of beasts, but I didn't write the document...

I guess as long as you aren't selling the vids/photos, or selling tickets, it's all groovy.