Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Mazda3... (Score 1) 185

The Mazda3 is available as a 6 speed manual if you are still looking for a fun manual car in general.

Funny thing though, now manuals are typically only available with premium trim levels aimed at enthusiasts, whereas before the cheapest version of a car was the version with the manual transmission.

Comment Firefox plugins to avoid this? (Score 3, Interesting) 77

Would a plugin that blocks tracking pixels fix the problem? I use firefox for android with Ublock Origin installed when I browse on the phone. I do use the facebook app when I access it on the phone, as they have made the mobile browser experience fairly terrible in comparison (on purpose.)

Comment Re:Fuck Adobe (Score 0) 59

Uh, no, not even close. CS6 master suite (with everything you get now) was $7,988 circa 2007. Photoshop alone was $700. Illustrator similar when it was a standalone product.

Now, if you have a CS subscription long enough, year after year, yes you'll pay that much eventually. But not for one year's subscription cost, even under the new price. But unlike the old days, you're getting all the updates continually without paying $150 - $200 for upgrading one standalone piece of software like PS.

I would say that for people who use a lot of the apps and on a continual basis year after year and want the latest updates, they are probably saving money overall and spreading out the cost evenly. (i.e. a design agency.) But for us little guys buying it personally as an independent artist, people who used to skip four or five versions before upgrading (that would be me) or only need a few pieces of software and not the whole suite, yea it's a raw deal over time.

When Adobe came up with the perpetual license, I'm sure they put in a lot of thought to the pricing model to make sure they overall weren't going to lose money and that they would make more money and make it more consistently in the long run. But it creates new winners and losers in their customer base in terms of what they are paying and depending on their needs. They definitely lost a lot of good will from regular starving artists who don't need another monthly bill, but can afford to occasionally buy something that they'll use for the next five years without dropping another dime. Paying $800 up front for 5 years of use rather than $800 every year is a big difference, even if you get access to everything else. Frankly, most of the new features year to year are just fluff and cosmetics, the only truly groundbreaking new feature has been gen AI.

Comment Meh (Score 1) 59

As an existing subscriber, I will likely go with the 'reduced AI' option because I don't really use AI except for light object removal with generative fill now and then.

I could actually live with the photographer plan but I actually use Illustrator a fair amount, and Acrobat to assemble, edit and otherwise convert and modify PDFs. I don't use much of anything else anymore.

I'd have to check to see if there's an alternative for Illustrator that will actually work for me. (usually the 'alternatives' are missing some key functionality...like CMYK support...or that one amazing vector graphics tool I desperately need that does not exist outside of illustrator.) Illustrator is a fairly terrible piece of software overall, but there is a lot of power buried inside of it if you need to do something esoteric.

Adobe CC is one of the very few 'subscriptions' I'll tolerate, simply because I've been a PS user since 1995 and I know it inside, out, backwards and forwards, and I like Lightroom for processing images. I even give classes on it at photography workshops.

Looking at it now though, the full suite price is starting to not be worth it at all given how little I use. They need a pick-your-own plan, but of course it's more money if they force everyone into the big one if you need to go outside PS and LR.

Comment Not surprising, but scary. (Score 2) 85

Convincing arguments and skilled debate are both learned things that most people are not good at. (I am not.) It's something you generally have to study and know and become good at. A few people are naturally good at it. AI algorithms hoover up all of the most convincing debate material and have that at perfect recall level, giving the average human a significant disadvantage. This is one area that it is not surprising that predictive AI is good at.

As a non-real-time debate person, usually I'll think of a good answer a few days later. With the algorithm, it's pretty much instantaneous. I'm sure it's already being used in troll farm posts everywhere.

Comment Re:What do we need assembly for (Score 2) 174

A few years ago I ported some legacy device firmware from its ancient Sun-based development environment to gcc (68k cross-compiler) and Linux. Most of the code compiled reasonably as-is. Some of it required a bit of hand-holding, like telling gcc that I really did need to store four characters one at a time rather than a single long when talking to a dual-port RAM interface.

Some of the low-level OS code did in fact require assembly. So be it.

...laura

Comment So many other things.... (Score 2) 52

So many other things external to the durability of the media have to go right for that data to read or want to be read that far in the future. It's difficult to tell whether technological society will have collapsed or just evolved to a point where all this is meaningless. In either case it may not be very useful. With a collapse, you have to bounce back to a recovery by that point. There is a minute chance that someone could discover the media an archeological style dig AND be able to read it with whatever technology is on hand. I think we're either going to go a direction where current computing technology is unrecognizably primitive, or we'll be gone by then. Not sure there is a middle ground.

Comment Whatever I do it will be wrong (Score 2) 22

I accept that no matter what I do at airport security it will be wrong. This is, according to some sources, by design. Keeps the bad guys on their toes. Something like that.

As a Canadian the only biometric ID I have is my passport. Despite the pressure to do so, I do not use it for domestic flights. International flights only. For U.S. domestic flights I use my drivers license. For Canadian domestic flights, my pilots license.

...laura

Comment Mobile hotspot (Score 4, Informative) 60

Sure but with mobile hotspot capabilities included with many phone plans (at least on Verizon with my unlimited plan with an Android phone...) you don't even need that, unless you're doing something bandwidth / data intensive.

I don't consider computing a public activity for me anyway, but I can see it being handy for someone who rents a room in an apartment in a big city and just needs to get out of dodge for a while.

Some friends and I owned one of the first internet cafes in Silicon Valley. This was the late 90s before widespread adoption of WiFi, so we had ethernet jacks at all tables that were up against a wall, and with each purchase you'd get a free hour on our T1 by keying the MAC address in from your machine. A friend wrote the code to handle that. You could also buy additional time inexpensively, or buy another coffee. We had plenty of room so overstaying one's welcome wasn't an issue, the local university students really liked it there. Fun times.

Slashdot Top Deals

In these matters the only certainty is that there is nothing certain. -- Pliny the Elder

Working...