Comment Re:Nothing to see here! (Score 1, Insightful) 107
If the payola doesn't repulse us, the damage that alleged administration has done to the justice system should. The Justice Department used to have stellar reputation. It worked via "regular order". Effectively it meant when the government, via the Justice Department, brought a case, the judge could rely upon the good faith of the Justice Department and its lawyers to follow the law to the last dot and tee, and honestly bring cases where there was evidence of an actual crime being committed.
You have to pay attention to what the judges have been saying recently, including court transcripts. Several judges have told Justice Department lawyers they no longer trust them and have caught them in flat out lies. Judges also talk amongst themselves. Many are now on the lookout for bad behavior and have threatened sanctions on the Dept. el Bunko is using the Justice Dept as his personal lawyers to go after perceived enemies (he gets new ones every day), so the judges are getting pissed. Now the Justice Dept. is trying to insert themselves into the E. Jean Carroll case where el Bunko was found guilty of sexual harassment and defamation.
The most glaring recent case concerned el Bunko's attempt to shake down the IRS for $10 Billion to be spent replenishing el Bunko's pals including the Jan 6 insurrectionists. The J. Dept filed a lawsuit against the IRS over some contractor in 2016-2019 disclosing some of el Bunko's tax records. So the gov. was suing the gov. which raised the judge's eyebrows. Eventually she killed the lawsuit, but not entirely. The Justice Dept then revoked their suit. A group of about 40-50 former judges and legal professionals petitioned the judge to reopen the case claiming the law suit was filed in bad faith just as cover for the $10 Billion.
Effectively, the administration was attempting to flim-flam the court. So she called a hearing whereupon the J. Dept claimed the judge couldn't do anything because they'd withdrawn the suit. The judge told them they were full of shit and they may have committed a crime playing the courts like this. In a case in Chicago, a Justice Dept. lawyer was vouching for her office's case to a grand jury, effectively telling them to trust the Justice Dept and ignore the evidence and indict anyhow. That lawyer broke regular order, that is not something judges will tolerate. Now every indictment brought will have the opposing lawyers demanding to see the grand jury records because no one trusts the Justice Dept. any longer.
Current stupid cases including the DA in Chicago lying to the judge, going after J. Comey for nothing more than doing his job (losing and then going after him for shells on beach spelling 86 47, i.e., 86 el Bunko....but 86 is an old restaurant term meaning to stop an order, not kill el Bunko, going after the Letticia James (NY's Att. Gen. , she brought the case that concluded el Bunko was guilty of fraud in NY), and there are more. Now el Bunko using the FBI to sniff around Gavin Newsome in the hopes of finding something, anything to tar him.
It has taken years for the Justice Dept. to build their reputation with the judiciary. el Bunko trashed in a year and half. It won't get regained easily. And that costs all of us money since cases will take longer. And one case was so tainted that the judge rejected the case with prejudice meaning the pair of criminals (they were liking guilt of Covid fraud) went free.