Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Instead, just force people to make a decision (Score 1) 343

I'm a second year law student, and I for one would hate to do without my laptop. I can type about 5 times faster than I can handwrite, and when I need to make corrections or additions to earlier notes, I can do it in an organized manner without scribbling things out and squeezing things in the margins and whatnot. When it comes time to put it in to outline form, organized notes are key. Also, taking exams using SofTest is a godsend.

Given that tuition my school costs about $1/minute for every lecture attended, you wouldn't figure too many students would be interested in screwing off, but it happens. There's only so many hours of Tax Law you can take before your mind craves escape. But still, lectures for some subjects and some professors frankly are a waste of time. You can read the materials and commercial briefs on your own and get everything you need. Listening to rambling philosophical ruminations is a terrible waste of preciously limited supply of time. The ABA requires minimum attendance of 80% of classes, which is fine, but when you have the inevitable 12 hours of studying or outlining to catch up on, skipping classes would help.

One professor I had last year for Property Law banned laptops from her classroom. She was a rather feminist type. I heard that the reason she banned them was because a student the year before had a screen saver which featured a hot chick who would loose an article of clothing after every couple minutes. The guys in the back of the class would all be like "awwww!" when he moved the mouse to take notes, and the timer would be reset to fully clothed.

I have actually found it distracting when someone is playing WoW or whatever in front of me in lecture, but I don't think there should be a universal ban. Law classes are pretty intimate settings and usually everyone pretty much knows everyone. The vast majority of the time students in a class can just handle these problems one-on-one.
Censorship

Yes Virginia, ISPs Have Silently Blocked Web Sites 204

Slashdot contributor Bennett Haselton writes "A recurring theme in editorials about Net Neutrality -- broadly defined as the principle that ISPs may not block or degrade access to sites based on their content or ownership (with exceptions for clearly delineated services like parental controls) -- is that it is a "solution in search of a problem", that ISPs in the free world have never actually blocked legal content on purpose. True, the movement is mostly motivated by statements by some ISPs about what they might do in the future, such as slow down customers' access to sites if the sites haven't paid a fast-lane "toll". But there was also an oft-forgotten episode in 2000 when it was revealed that two backbone providers, AboveNet and TeleGlobe, had been blocking users' access to certain Web sites for over a year -- not due to a configuration error, but by the choice of management within those companies. Maybe I'm biased, since one of the Web sites being blocked was mine. But I think this incident is more relevant than ever now -- not just because it shows that prolonged violations of Net Neutrality can happen, but because some of the people who organized or supported AboveNet's Web filtering, are people in fairly influential positions today, including the head of the Internet Systems Consortium, the head of the IRTF's Anti-Spam Research Group, and the operator of Spamhaus. Which begs the question: If they really believe that backbone companies have the right to silently block Web sites, are some of them headed for a rift with Net Neutrality supporters?" Read on for the rest of his story.

Slashdot Top Deals

A successful [software] tool is one that was used to do something undreamed of by its author. -- S. C. Johnson

Working...