Firstly, AI and automation actually net-replacing human labour this time has been predictable since the late 1980s, as AI started shaping up.
i.e. the observation that it really will be different this time since, in job category after job category, AIs and/or automated processes, which are continually being improved, sometimes in leaps and bounds, will inevitably cross a threshold of being probably more absolutely effective and definitely more cost-effective than a person. Economic activity in capitalist competition will then adjust to those economic facts.
Secondly, we now, in the current and next few years period definitely have:
a. the in-the-moment rise of fairly general Agentic AI, including reasoning, problem break-down etc. on top of a huge and comprehensive knowledge base and domain-specific knowledge bases
b. the last few years improvements in LLM systems for
i. writing
ii. information search and summarization tasks across wide but also deep knowledge domains
iii. creative tasks
c. Humanoid robots emerging over the next few years with capability for:
i. general flexible learning based on observing and practicing
ii. cross-training so that the whole fleet of robots learns what each individual one learns.
d: Actually self-driving cars and trucks
You can no longer say this is some unlikely hypothetical sci-fi future scenario. The job displacement (coders, ironically enough), and in high-expertise jobs (lawyer, doctor, engineer) job devaluation, is already starting to happen, reflected in lower hiring plans not compensating for attrition at a minimum.
Factory and other manual labour jobs will be next, after c. and d. develop for a few more years. Many thought those manual jobs would be first, but turns out they are more challenging for computers than replacing white-collar work.
This is not hypothetical. Planning for the economic shake-up needs to start now. Hint. Repatriating factories is not the solution. Will you be happy that robots of your nationality are doing the work instead of those evil foreign robots? No.