Don't be so naive,

You are confusing asymmetric warfare with religious/tribal feuds. The fact that U.S. troops get continually killed and maimed by IEDs in Iraq is exactly the same sort of asymmetric warfare practiced by the "Americans" during the American Revolution. To "stand in a straight line" against the British would have been suicide, just the same as it would be for the "insurgents" to fight a set piece battle with U.S. troops. So the idea that people will try to manipulate the battle field to their own advantage is hardly "revolutionary".

What you are complaining about is religious and tribal feuding. While this is often savage and barbaric, it is entirely something different. Were those suicide bombers targeting the occupation forces when they blew up their own country people? No, those sort of attacks were meant to further provoke and incite religious and tribal feuds, which are meant to ultimately help their own religious/tribal agenda. They would be the equivalent (while highly exaggerated) of right-wing fanatics taking advantage of a Chinese invasion to murder every member of MoveOn.org to push their religious agenda.

Next time you speak on a matter please do a bit of home work, or exercise a bit of critical thinking,

-geoff