Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:They're more dangerous than any other vehicle.. (Score 1) 146

I used to cycle at speeds of up to 38 mph

And I bet your bike weighed 20 lbs. or less, vs. an e-bike with an average weight of 50+ lbs., some of them up to 80 lbs. plus whatever additional weight for their cube-shaped food delivery containers and contents.

Regardless, at that speed, I'd argue you should be on the main road as well, or at least nowhere where you might be come within a couple feet of an unsuspecting pedestrian at 38 mph..

Comment They're more dangerous than any other vehicle... (Score 5, Insightful) 146

... to pedestrians in cities with high foot and cycling traffic.

I spend a lot of time in a major European city which has dedicated bike lanes on most major streets. I get around by walking and using a regular bicycle.

I now consider e-bikes to be the most likely vehicle I'm going to be hit by, either as a pedestrian or a biker, because they're fast and often times *practically silent*. As a pedestrian, the sidewalk and bike lines in this city are often both part of the same stretch of "sidewalk" where the bike lane is only designated by a line or the use of different bricks. This means that bikes and pedestrians are sharing the same space, and bikers often go out of the bike lane to pass other bikers, putting them in very close proximity to pedestrians and what are now very high e-bike speeds. Someone moving unexpectedly, or a child suddenly bolting from behind a walking parent, could mean a serious accident. It can be argued that this is an infrastructure problem, but even if you create completely separated bike lanes, you still have the issue of silence combined with high speed (and mass) relative to other cyclists: The other day I was biking on a quiet off-street with no other traffic on the road. Out of nowhere, a food delivery e-biker flew past my left side at easily twice my speed. The sound of the air passing my ears from casually cycling was enough to cover what little sound his bike made such that I never heard him coming, and had I veered left from my course just before he passed, I'm certain I would've ended up in the emergency room.

The food delivery e-bikers are a huge part of the problem: they're under pressure to go fast, which means they're also more likely to take risks, and even if they see need to stop, they're moving the extra weight of their delivery plus the heavier bike itself (battery, larger frame, often big tires) to hinder a fast stop.

With all this in mind, I'm of the opinion that 1. e-bikes should only be allowed on actual roads (not bike paths), because any law saying "certain e-bikes" or even having a speed limit on a bike path would be extremely difficult to enforce, plus these e-bikes are often traveling at the same speed as cars, and 2. e-bike drivers should require a license, *at least* for commercial use, i.e. food delivery, which must be verified by the company, with steps taken to ensure the registered driver is the one doing the actual deliveries (so no one can "borrow" a friend's delivery account), and a visibly displayed license on the bike.

TL;DR: e-bikes are now as fast as mopeds but silent, and should be treated as such.

Comment Re:Fuel or electrical? (Score 3, Insightful) 106

2. Apparently a solar storm hit exactly at the time of the crash, raising questions about induced currents causing an electrical failure.

The emergency turbine shouldn't have deployed if it were bad gas, so that leads to the sudden electrical failure causing the crash.

I haven't heard anything about this the solar storm theory but I don't buy it. Takeoff and landing are the two most likely times for something to go wrong leading to a plane crash. That a solar storm just happened to cause a power failure with this specific plane at this specific bad-luck time, and no other plane in the world at the time (I assume we would've heard about that), goes against Occam's razor in my mind.

Comment Re:A recent experience (Score 2) 180

My takeaway is that cashless transactions are fine, right up until the moment they suddenly stop working for whatever reason

This. Spain got a lesson in this just a couple months ago with its massive power outage. Add in internet and payment processors and you have 3 potential points of failure. As much as I prefer paying by card, maintaining the option to pay cash is smart.

Comment Re:Bring back those horrible metal caps. (Score 2) 30

For serious, the easy solution is right there, go back to metal caps on all glass bottles. Twist off caps are still available on quite a bit, but even just going back and using a bottle opener would be fine.

It sounds like you're talking about the very caps (i.e. beer bottle caps) that the article says are the problem? Maybe you can link a pic of the caps you're talking about.

Comment Re:Ecodesign requirements (Score 5, Interesting) 34

From that page:

The ecodesign requirements will include:

— resistance to accidental drops or scratches and protection from dust and water

— sufficiently durable batteries which can withstand at least 800 charge and discharge cycles while retaining at least 80% of their initial capacity

— rules on disassembly and repair, including obligations for producers to make critical spare parts available within 5-10 working days, and for 7 years after the end of sales of the product model on the EU market >

availability of operating system upgrades for longer periods (at least 5 years from the date of the end of placement on the market of the last unit of a product model)

— non-discriminatory access for professional repairers to any software or firmware needed for the replacement

The (bolded) requirement of 5 years of OS upgrades from date of end placement on the market is huge for Android devices, as currently to get that you pretty much need to buy a high-end Samsung or Google Pixel device.

Regarding battery replacement, the above pages links to https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/... in which section 4c, states:

From 20 June 2025, manufacturers, importers or authorised representatives shall ensure that the process for battery replacement: meets the following criteria:

— fasteners shall be resupplied or reusable;

the process for replacement shall be feasible with no tool, a tool or set of tools that is supplied with the product or spare part, or basic tools;

— the process for replacement shall be able to be carried out in a use environment;

the process for replacement shall be able to be carried out by a layman.

It will be very interesting to see how device manufacturers deal with the battery replacement issue, and whether the whole "we have to glue your phone together to keep it waterproof!" argument holds any water.

Comment Re:Oh boy! (Score 1) 38

If you can't modernize, just slap a 70's theme on everything on make it appear as retro-by-design. They can issue 70's-era uniforms to all MTA staff. Hire some local actors to ride the subway performing as 70's crazy people. Make the whole thing a theme park ride.

Tourists arriving from Europe and Asia will get that gritty New York experience that will make them say "Wow!", instead of stepping onto the subway at the airport wondering if they've just entered a 3rd world country.

Submission + - SPAM: Starliner's troubles were much worse than NASA made clear

An anonymous reader writes: According to a long interview given to Eric Berger of Ars Technica, the astronauts flying Boeing's Starliner capsule on its first manned mission in June 2024 were much more vulnerable than NASA made it appear at the time.

First, the thruster problem when they tried to dock to ISS was more serious than revealed. At several points Butch Wilmore, who was piloting the spacecraft, was unsure if he had enough thrusters to safely dock the capsule to ISS. Worse, if he couldn't dock he also did not know if had enough thrusters to de-orbit Starliner properly.

In other words, he and his fellow astronaut Sunni Williams might only have a few hours to live.

The situation was saved by mission control engineers, who figured out a way to reset the thrusters and get enough back on line so that the spacecraft could dock autonomously.

Second, once docked it was very clear to the astronauts and NASA management that Starliner was a very unreliable lifeboat.

Wilmore added that he felt pretty confident, in the aftermath of docking to the space station, that Starliner probably would not be their ride home.

Wilmore: "I was thinking, we might not come home in the spacecraft. We might not. And one of the first phone calls I made was to Vincent LaCourt, the ISS flight director, who was one of the ones that made the call about waiving the flight rule. I said, 'OK, what about this spacecraft, is it our safe haven?'"

It was unlikely to happen, but if some catastrophic space station emergency occurred while Wilmore and Williams were in orbit, what were they supposed to do? Should they retreat to Starliner for an emergency departure, or cram into one of the other vehicles on station, for which they did not have seats or spacesuits? LaCourt said they should use Starliner as a safe haven for the time being. Therein followed a long series of meetings and discussions about Starliner's suitability for flying crew back to Earth. Publicly, NASA and Boeing expressed confidence in Starliner's safe return with crew. But Williams and Wilmore, who had just made that harrowing ride, felt differently.

Wilmore: "I was very skeptical, just because of what we'd experienced. I just didn't see that we could make it." [emphasis mine]


Link to Original Source

Submission + - "Real Genius" star Val Kilmer Dead at 65 (imdb.com)

EmagGeek writes: Val Kilmer, star of the iconic 90's science-comedy film "Real Genius," has died at the age of 65 from complications due to pneumonia. Many of us remember his breakout role in the cult classic, where he starred as brilliant yet unmotivated student Chris Wright, whose intellect overshadowed his professor and archenemy Prof. Jerry Hathaway, played by William Atherton, another notable film actor known for his roles in blockbuster films such as Ghostbusters and popular Christmas movie Die Hard. He had many other notable roles including his brilliant portrayal of Jim Morrison in "The Doors," and also many forgettable appearances in B-movies such as Top Gun and a movie in The Batman series.

He was a versatile actor who enjoyed the craft and refused to be typecast. We'll miss him.

Slashdot Top Deals

Mausoleum: The final and funniest folly of the rich. -- Ambrose Bierce

Working...