Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re: Fat (Score 1) 283

Tend to agree with this. Fact is, it's always about pointing to someone _else_ to do the fixing. It's never "_I_ will do without my fave foods (beef?)/air conditioning/car/phone and PC and TV/swimming pool/fast food ..." And as always no solutions (for others to implement) are valid except a return to the Stone Age ... which simply isn't an option. Nuclear power is safely manageable and the most logical solution to clean energy. Educate yourself if you think otherwise ... and _do_ something about climate change besides ranting about it online.

Comment not evil ... just devs being devs (Score 1) 97

likely just the devs making reaching out and touching a device easier on themselves.

just think, the devs can push updates and instant fixes. they can also properly assess a customer complaint to see if it is their device or the customer has a crapload of malware on the device. its all just good business.

not everything is a nefarious conspiracy.

Comment Blog vague on when, why ... and the problem (Score 1) 52

During the 2010 Olympics in Vancouver? The blog contains no information on the _one_ use of the Stingray. What is the blog hiding? They had the info since the blog writes:

"The VPD provided some context for its previous use of a Stingray and on the basis of the information they gave us, we can vouch for their past use (and they say there’s only been one) being legitimate, appropriate and properly authorized."

So, the time the Vancouver Police Force did use it (kept secret by the blogger?), it was legitimate, appropriate, and properly authorized ... from which the blog seems to conclude that obviously it has been and is being used illegitimately, inappropriately, and unauthorized. What?

Comment But ... the system worked. They already knew ... (Score 1) 660

... the shooter was a problem. They didn't know exact plans and timings, but they had successfully identified a potential problem.

As with so many previous incidents, the current 'spying' privileges allowed the identification of a potential problem.

What was lacking was funding to allow continued surveillance, NOT more in depth surveillance, just more surveillance. See the difference?

Is there a belief that deeper 'spying' will permit law enforcement to do more with increasingly less funding?

Slashdot Top Deals

Line Printer paper is strongest at the perforations.