I agree that the Officers were obviously behaving inappropriately. They agree, the department agrees, and most people commenting agree. The question is whether or not, playing a Wii is worth questioning the entire seizure, their whole career, or even the entire department's credibility. Now, I am inclined to believe that since the incident recorded, that the seizure may not be lost. However, I would have to scrutinize the tape to come to a conclusion on that subject. Since they didn't know that they were being recorded it could reveal some other information about the validity of their actions on this particular seizure. It could reveal that they planned to lie about a part of the raid, or even that this was a moment of weakness after a period of great strain, a stupid moment. They are human.
I know that that's not an acceptable excuse; there isn't one. However, I don't think that it's necessary to begin questioning whether they planted evidence or stole evidence. I disagree that playing a Wii on duty is on the same level of dishonesty / inappropriate behavior as stealing or planting evidence.