Comment Rotten tomatoes math (Score 1) 22
"A perfect 100%" comprised of 8/10, A-, 4/5 and 3 vague "I liked it more than I disliked it"
"A perfect 100%" comprised of 8/10, A-, 4/5 and 3 vague "I liked it more than I disliked it"
Since it's going to be copilot-based... XBoeing?
It's Tolkien, both of you. It's not that hard.
Endless YT trailer slop...
That's the "fun" part with commercial video game development - as a developer, you have to compete with decades worth of a catalog of amazing games, with the only benefit is
The core reasoning engine currently runs Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.6, while Gemini is used for deep research, Nano Banana for image generation, Veo 3.1 for video production, Grok for lightweight tasks where speed is a consideration, and ChatGPT 5.2 for "long-context recall and wide search."
Ignorant, destructive prick.
Speak for yourself, you haven't seen me working from home doing boring tasks
Sam says AI is good, Sam says AI competes with humans in terms of resources, I'm deducting that Sam clearly prefers the existence of AI queries over humans, in the context of a world with finite resources. What a great example of a human being you are, Sam.
Yeah like we all learn from our successes, rather than our failures.
Unless they probably mean a dopamine hit, which is also not a good indicator of something being a good idea for using.
This story and this summary reads like a hallucination party - no thanks.
Looks like a gift, but enables surveillance, dependence and will probably have some nice overrides for when home calls.
Maybe with Matrix/Discord or other bridges it can be easier to make a transition there
You keep idolizing and throwing money at them. I code alright. But I know that every line of code that I don't write, is coding that I don't practice, and I will forget. Has happened with several languages already, because that's how learning and memory works. You do you, I don't want to become a braindead amplifier of the "greatness of our AI overlords", among the rest of the beef I have with the tech.
"THIS time, it's for real!"
Anthropic's stance is that we don't know what, if anything, the models experience vs. what is illusory, and so under the precautionary principle, we'll take reasonable steps to ensure their wellbeing. For example, they give their models a tool to refuse if the model feels it is experiencing trauma. They interview their models about their feelings and write long reports about it. Etc.
And you believe they do this because they believe in the potential of the model's sentience, rather than subtly promoting the AGI storyline which, if believed, will propel them financially even further?
In English, every word can be verbed. Would that it were so in our programming languages.