Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Twitter, I mean X is still extant? (Score 1) 89

Why would he repost some local news from some town in Scotland? I meant small in terms of international fame; it's not Glasgow or Edinburgh. It doesn't matter if he's aware or not, it was a pot-stirring immigrant-hate opportunity, reality be damned. Who cares about the whole story or the actual details these days, right? It's easy to repost a picture and a headline, and make your own context with your own biases, the "beauty" of social media. But go on and find excuses for him. Who cares about the Guardian headline, just found some link containing accurate information in case you hadn't heard about that - Guardian might spin it but they don't post fake news.

Comment So much winning... (Score 1) 61

Reading about US stories, especially about policy changes and other government actions, reminds me of the "Florida man" stories... "What on earth have they done again?" ...

I love the bit about coal-powered data centers, given the impact of burning coal and the ever-growing need for data centers, that's match made in heaven.

Comment Re:Twitter, I mean X is still extant? (Score 4, Insightful) 89

It's not about his personality. He can be a dickhead for all I care. But when he uses his platform to effectively indirectly create problems for my life, well, I'm not going to jump for support. And you might think I'm over-reacting, but well he's actively contributing to the rise of right-wing parties in Europe and sowing discord, so there's that. I find it funny that you think DOGE was genuine. There are way too many pricks to spend time ranting about - this thread was about X.

Comment Re:Twitter, I mean X is still extant? (Score 4, Insightful) 89

Can you explain maybe the mindset of people who support the platform of a guy who publicly sieg heils and also very publicly, blatantly and unashamedly tries to sow political discord? I'm especially interest in the mindset of people who are against these things. My own take is basically no faith in humanity and that everyone's cheap and would support anyone who would throw them a (publicity/exposure) bone, so I'm all ears.

Comment Re:you guys are morons (Score 1) 152

I don't disagree. And in slopes if you're going up you get screwed anyway regardless of the car type from the other lane, but at least that's not as common for most. For me the most effective approach to driving at night is with retroreflective paint and low-lights. Nobody's getting blinded, reduced light pollution and perfect contrast.

Comment Re:you guys are morons (Score 1) 152

That works if you optimizing for not blinding others rather than, you know, seeing well in the dark in front of you at a cone. And when it's cloudy, it *is* darker, I'm not sure where you live but I live in a country that's mostly cloudy and the difference is very much observable.

Slashdot Top Deals

Force needed to accelerate 2.2lbs of cookies = 1 Fig-newton to 1 meter per second

Working...