Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
Get HideMyAss! VPN, PC Mag's Top 10 VPNs of 2016 for 55% off for a Limited Time ×

Comment Re:doesn't matter (Score 1) 764

Of course, they are "under her control": if she had told them to increase security, they would have done it. And, of course, the staff and experts that slosh around her campaign and the DNC are likely later to get involved in her administration.

Clinton does not run the Democratic National Committee, Debbie Wasserman Schultz does - at least until the end of the convention. About 30 minutes ago, she announced she will be resigning because of this issue. Furthermore, the head of the Democratic Party is, at the moment, President Obama but, unless the duties for POTUS have changed and Obama has taken a Learning Annex course in computer system administration I don't know about, I'm sure he doesn't spend his days monitoring server logs at the DNC.

Certainly someone is directly responsible for not adequately protecting the DNC email systems, but it's not Clinton (or Obama). Ms. Wasserman Schultz had managerial responsibility and is owning up to the failures of this issue.

But, please continue to believe whatever fantasies you want about how things work.

I'm simply anti-Clinton because I think she is incompetent, deeply corrupt, and dangerous.

Have fun voting for Trump...

Comment Re:doesn't matter (Score 1, Insightful) 764

Do you really need to have this spelled out for you? She couldn't even protect E-mails ... [remainder omitted because it's even more stupid]

Do you? The systems at the DNC do not belong to her and are not under her supervision or control. The DNC is a private organization:

The DNC is composed of the chairs and vice-chairs of each state Democratic Party committee and over 200 members elected by Democrats in all 50 states and the territories. Its chairperson is elected by the committee. It conducts fundraising to support its activities.

Jesus, can you be anymore ignorant and/or partisan.

Comment Re:doesn't matter (Score 5, Informative) 764

If anybody outside the Democratic party can leak these E-mails, then Hillary didn't take sufficient care of them and can't be trusted with national security secrets. Thanks, Hillary, for confirming this once again.

They were stolen from DNC systems. They contain email related to the election not national security issues.

... discuss reports that Russia had hacked into systems at the Democratic National Committee.

Comment Re:Anything for work (Score 4, Insightful) 238

Side note: some years ago I went to a class by an "expert" who said that code should be so clear it never needs comments (sort of okay so far) so therefore code should never have comments in it (I walked out at that point).

Comments describing exactly what you're doing should be relatively unnecessary. However, comments as to *why* you're (not) doing something or how you're doing something, especially if it's non-obvious and/or "clever" are always appropriate. Code is changed for many reasons. Commentary can help understanding of various facets in various ways.

Personally, I think clear logic and consistent style are most helpful for both coding and commenting. Most people should be able to skim your code and have a general understanding of what's going on and why. I always try to write my code so that more junior people (and, quite frankly, even more senior people) on our team will be able to learn from my examples and work with what I've written. (You know, in case I get hit by a bus tomorrow.)

Slashdot Top Deals

All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.