I will not pretend I understand the paper, but this is a big deal! I find it annoyingly funny that the very mathematical definition of the continuity hypothesis (on which fluid dynamics is based), that the density equals the limit of DeltaMass/DeltaVolume for DeltaVolume going to zero, will break up if you actually apply it in reality: for volumes down at the atomic level the mass is not equally distributed anymore unless you use probabilities. This is very helpful in explaining some fluid dynamic principles, like Bernoulli's principle. Deng et al. got our back!

Does it also work when you have a bleeding nose and a broken jaw? Asking for a friend.

+1 Funny, because it's funny.
+1 Insightful, because you should *really* not forget your error bars.
+1000 Interesting, because you used the actual ± symbol. I had to look up how to do it.

Getting to the moon, or mars, in general only requires a single push. Without drag there is nothing to slow down the spacecraft afterwards and you don't need to keep pushing. So you can push once against the magnetic field of the earth if you are pointed in the right direction, and also get to your destination in a reasonable amount of time. The actual questions are: 1. can you push hard enough for accelerating to a reasonable velocity within a reasonable time? 2. What about correction burns/pushes? I suppose you will still need conventional thrusters for course corrections.

They were thought to be dwarfed Homo erectus. Homo erectus is not a modern human.

Well, one thing you're missing is the fact that when humans learn something, they don't start from scratch. The driving instructor teaches you not only the basic rules, but also empirical cues so that you can learn quickly. Ditto for chess, learned and self-obtained experience informs the grandmaster that some opening moves are better than others. Those others and their algorithmic children don't need to be checked. A computer brute forcing a problem like chess or driving will be lousy, but if you give it more empirical information (weights and biases), like teaching a human, it will perform better.

Nobody said that horsepower was based on a *good* horse...

Indeed, all companys offering mods will be all over this. So much potential!

"LineShine uses semi-custom 304-core LX2 processors based on the Armv9 instruction set architecture running at 1.55GHz. The LX2 appears to have been co-designed with China's National Supercomputing Center and Huawei, with 40,960 chips deployed across 92 cabinets. It has a total of 13,789,440 cores." From: https://www.datacenterdynamics...

How about a bait and switch? Lure everyone in promising MS-Office compatibility, then switch the default saving setting to a standardized format. People even start getting oblivious to the fact that there are files out there somewhere in the cloud, nobody cares about the extension...

Donotwant. Then the car will bother me all the time about infotainment subscriptions, heated seat subscriptions and the like. I'd like to hover some plastic and enter a pin, thank you!

Funny that you say that. I was looking at a magazine from the 50ies the other day, and those ads were super verbose! I mean, they really had *text*! Whole paragraphs of it!!! So, no, reading advertisements *today* certainly does not involve reading from a historical perspective.

To be fair, the WebEx GUI is a disease. WebEx used to be better than Teams, but now it's the other way around.

That's all nice and well, kudos to your dad-in-law, but you didn't tell us *how* does he actually achieve such good results since it's not the homework? Maybe it's a combination of a lot of factors, including teaching talent, but maybe you have a couple of hints? Or point us to one of his "papers on education"? Honest question.

The wikipedia list is not sorted.