Of course it wasn't their warnings. Quite the opposite, it was the much earlier bellicose nature of it'll take all our jobs and cost US$5 trillion per year. And it'll drive cars easy-peasy and it'll cure every ill and even now, we'll no longer need to learn a thing. Over the top predictions that everyone knows is bullshit.

They gotta sell the lie for as long as possible. Once the bubble bursts they can run off with all that loot.

And PTSD falls into which category?

It's always puzzled me why there is no clear reporting distinction between concussive brain damage, does this even have a label?, and PTSD. The two seem to be lumped together in media reporting.

That would be impressively poor communication about events then. Either by the cruise ship captain or the coast guard, depending on how the media verified the story. A refusal is obviously a reply in layman's words.

The excuse doesn't at all line up with the "repeatedly refused to assist" either. Which seems to indicate there was clear communication of refusal.

The stats says otherwise. And I haven't seen you produce any evidence. Just a continuous stream of abuse so far.

Not really a rebuttal there. AI slop is submitted and there is more bugs because of it.

Just because you aren't using AI to write code doesn't mean others haven't done so. Linus is on record saying AI is welcome as long as it works. Well, what works is still up for grabs. People will be using the new tools. And slop is one thing that AI is already well known for.

Parts 1 to 30.

And a lot of those will be AI assisted fixes. After all, many fixes are recent ones found by AI scans.

Take a guess at what a Release Candidate (RC) is about.

This is an RC for lots and lots of **new** code. That's what RCs are about! Therefore these **are** new bugs, and many will be AI generated, that's given in today's world.

They are new bugs in new AI generated code.

Except that too much AI slop is the reason why those were brand new bugs.