has changed to "screw you, I'm doing it anyway."

The behaviour is still the same, but the excuses have changed.

The survey's sample sizes would've been the same. Shitty drivers and hardware would explain most of the imbalance. M$'s gung-ho approach doesn't help though. They're constantly having to re-adjust when reality clubs them on the head.

Which is too quickly becoming: trillions and trillions!

You said greater than 10 years ago.

Yes, of course. Anything deliberate falls under security. Anyone can jump off a bridge if they choose to. The safety barriers only serve as accidental protections.

Stable Diffusion is only 3.5 years old. Maybe you are an LLM?

Buying stuff online is pretty hit and miss. If the service could handle product returns for anything deemed unfit/unsuited then that would make it a proper shopping replacement.

It's actually a security concern, not safety. The car was in fact conforming in accordance with good safety practices.

I find dotNet based programs tends to end in tears on Wine. They either crash easy or never run at all. I use a number of industrial controller programming tools and none work because of dotNet shenanigans.

Be prepared to pay $$$ for each answer then. The rush to centralise is a big telltale.

$50 billion each!

No different to Sam Altman. Except he hasn't asked for trillions of dollars yet.

Ban the user tracking to eliminate the drive for data collection. That way, there isn't a whole load of exceptions needed on why data can still be collected for legitimate reasons.

Another side effect of banning tracking is the ad industry reverts back to a level playing field for the non-Internet ad markets.

I say GO (you sloppy) AIs !!!! The sooner the user tracking and push algorithms stops, the better.

I presume Google's TPU would be classed as dedicated. There are others, like the mind bogglingly large Cerebras WSE series, but most don't get a lot of interest.