I said Linux has no direct equivalent to Solaris Zones. That statement is true, your foul mouth non-withstanding.
No, you said:
Solaris Zones is an example of operating system virtualisation. There is no direct equivalent on Linux. There is a single kernel for all the zones. A single set of device drivers. A single process tree. Potentially a single storage system. It's extremely lightweight compared to virtual machines.
All the above is true to Linux VServers - single kernel, single set of device drivers, single process tree*, potentially a single storage system, and it is extremely lightweight compared to virtual machines.
You should re-read the definition of strawman.
I still beleive that you are trying to pull a strawman. You said that there is no kernel-level virtualization for Linux - I pointed out that there is a kernel-level virtualization for Linux with roughly the same advantages/features you listed in the above quote, and now you are trying to imply that I said the VServer and Zones have exactly the same features. That looks like a nice fat strawman.
You should re-read the definition of strawman. You aren't using the term correctly.
And then you are trying to attack my person instead of trying to counter my statements. You are indeed full of shit.
You are right that I have a foul mouth, on the other hand.
* I think it's a single process tree per context, but it can be viewed as one tree with "vpstree".