Comment Re:If you are posting vulnerabilities to hurt anyo (Score 1) 29
Harming Microsoft both causes harm now and reduces later harm done by Microsoft. What's the net?
Harming Microsoft both causes harm now and reduces later harm done by Microsoft. What's the net?
It's only a matter of time before the US Government goes private and merges with Amazon, they'll be getting your call recordings to feed to Amazon Transcribe in short order anyway. Luckily it's actually shit so it will get all of the numbers wrong and decide you said you would do things you said you wouldn't and vice versa.
Child rape enthusiasts came to try to hide facts.
Slashdot has become a haven for child rape lovers and Nazis, but I repeat myself.
I think they have missed the point. Ai "is" making it ourselves.
hahahahahhahahahahahah no.
It absolutely is not making it yourself. If it were, you'd be able to get a copyright on your slop.
I enjoy being able to get stuff made by AI, but I'm not doing it. I'm guiding the process, but it is fundamentally not my work.
Something feels terribly off as if the full extent of his misdeeds or being at a crossroads with someone (Trump?) are yet to be revealed.
Why don't you just stop being incredibly fucking stupid instead?
Take my dick out of your mouth before you speak again. You're mumbling.
But that is not what Google is referring to. They are saying that schools cannot have the normal search without the AI hallucinations.
Because
That is exactly the lie I was speaking of which you are repeating. Thanks for finding that, liar!
Has he done anything Elon Musk has not also done?
I ain't seen him sieg heil yet
But that is not what Google is referring to. They are saying that schools cannot have the normal search without the AI hallucinations. Also, if AI is meaningfully involved with Google's traditional search results, then that only serves to explain why they are so shit now. But most importantly, this argument is the one that Google wants us to have, and it is bullshit.
The schools are not, in general, making a moral objection to AI. They are making a practical one, where they do not want the students exposed to a chatbot while a human is trying to teach them something sans hallucination. Having a discussion about whether the traditional search results have any AI in them is fundamentally disingenuous, which is why I am 0% surprised to see you engaging in it.
Aside from some "Office 363" jokes
We had that joke today on Teams.
Other employee: Looks more like Office 364
Me: I think it's more like Office 363 now
Assorted smiley reaccs ensue.
Some entity will need to lose serious money before anything will happen. And when something does, it will be regulated lock-in, not a return to a diverse email system.
Either thing would be better than this. This is fucking chaos.
Just making excuses for CEOs not being able to follow the law, you mean.
Fuck off with that shit, it's morally bankrupt.
The people you are talking about are rich as fuck, they can afford to meet people on international vacations. No matter what I will not cry for the fucking billionaires, nor lick their boots.
Read the third paragraph of the summary.
Illiteracy is sad, especially here
You're a fucking idiot, that's my rebuttal. You know how nothing works, that's my rebuttal.
Lol the people who rape employees have mod points
They haven't lost all trust, though. Most orgs will learn nothing and change nothing.
When a fellow says, "It ain't the money but the principle of the thing," it's the money. -- Kim Hubbard