Does it also take our code for training?

Just like the Chinese have been doing for ages now. I think users will cope and gradually move to other services. Some will use proxies just like the Chinese do, but in the long term - local services will prevail.

It is a good thing Russia cannot send SWAT teams to enforce their laws like some other country did to the MEGA upload guy and his New Zealand company.

And now this. I feel so sorry for Red Hat, and also for Cygnus and other teams they swallowed.

R.I.P.

Especially because I would have no guarantee at all it is what I will really get.

There is a lot of drama in the world currently, but interest groups like Nvidia have their agendas. Paint a dramatic picture and money will pour in. As many people equate efficiency/shorter waiting times with quantity of money, it is what will be pushed for. And probably achieved.
Chip independence may be critical or not, it may take 20 years or 2, but that is not an issue. How much money will flow because of all of it is the issue here.
I know it sounds cynical but it is exactly what at least most of it is about. If not all.

It looks like a duopoly is in control of a very important industry.

He might have not replaced any of those with $100bn but he would definitely get in the game and start getting traction.

Like the Chinese with their rumored chips are doing.

I got an email asking me how much I would like to pay for ..... They collect offers, and take and charge one offering most :).

Europe has one reason for the cancellation of such plants I do not find in this article: Russian supplies are cut and the era of cheap gas is gone.

The economy of gas plants is primarily the price o gas. The article does not even mention it :).

Also, state regulations are a big factor. If you put regulation burden onto gas and subsidy solar... Wow, look how the economy shifts!

Meaning cheaper than the iPhone, when the display area is accounted for?

Journalism these days.

I am too old to believe their interest aligns with the common good. If it were, as some other poster pointed out - VOLVO electric cars would be cheaper - for example.

I tried it with a simple "convert date to Unix timestamp" function for an embedded project I am working on. Spent hours debugging other code until I got a look at ChatGPT's one and found it simply does not work.
So, YMMV, and you have to double-check everything. To me, it does not look like something to debug another's code :).

It must be true.

20 meters from a geostationary orbit, which means 35000+ kilometers above LEOs.

That orbit means one satellite is enough to cover China with neighborhood.

We already accepted CO2 as something to be afraid of, something polluting our environment.

Dihydrogen monoxide is the logical next step, an enemy we should fight! Because it will destroy our iPhones and Macs if given time!

You see, the biggest promoters of "climate science" are said "wealthy hypocrites". But, as recognized by people moderating this, I was being sarcastic there.

On a serious note... The climate is changing, so some problem (for humans defying nature by living in places we did not inhabit in earlier times) exists. But is CO2 our problem? Are humanity's actions a problem? Are we sure there? Isn't CO2 basic food for plants and aren't we seeing our planet greener and greener, so more oxygen is produced as we speak? What energies are we talking about here and do we, as species, generate enough of it to influence the climate system? What percent of Earth's biosphere are humans?

I think it is very easy to blow somebody's importance and then use it to get to other things, usually measurable by money value. Like "YOU are influencing all life on the planet!". No, I am not :).

Science was always about skepticism. And skepticism is forbidden when it comes to "climate debate".

Etc. Have a nice day!