Does AI still use Em dashes?

Everyone asks it not to. And the models probably adjusted due to feedback.

It'd be like looking for lead in the air to detect a car that drove by. The time where that detection work has passed.

The first like shows a 10% drop over a few years then flat (long range).

Basically flat (mid range)

And 15% drop then flat (standard plus)

Not linear at all.

Lead used bad chemistry and no/poor cooling.

The first gen i3 used crumnny tech too.

I can't speak to the early GM products.

But for the most part effort was put into good temperature management (Tesla) and more robust battery chemistry (pretty much anything in the last 10ish years).

The Leaf was made super budget and it killed the batteries.

Pretty sure this was hand crafted algorithm if it happened in 2011.

It's more of a lesson in the difficulty of communicating business logic when creating a project (which will obviously impact AI, but can cause problems for people too).

Generally laid off high end talent gets 3x hourly on rehire (based on my friend's parents).

I'm shocked that Ford had a standard of quality that let them notice.

I read an article recently where Ford was bragging about testing one engine a day off an assembly line for quality control. Ford felt that was an amazing dedication to quality.

I imagine there will be birthday randomizers in pretty much every repo.

I've literally never seen praise for Poettering on the blogs. Only critisosm of him and all of his projects.

The fact that the projects are picked up and used by distros leads me to believe that perhaps the blogs are mistaken and there's something we're all missing.

They're going to make 30% of the population immortal and you think the number is made up?

I'd like to see corporations able to be tried as people. 5 year jail sentence = 5 year government ownership.

Tie it to GDP and use it to make sure no companies get too big to fail so we don't need to socialize the risk. It'll also assure that there's competition.

I think we're both somewhat sarcastic, but there is a certain beauty to using it as a way to foster competition and reduce the need for bail outs.

I'm not into socialism, but I'm not convinced it's worse than 1 company having control of what's today's entire GDP in the relatively short term. And that's what SpaceX is claiming they'll have in the case for their valuation.

I'm pretty sure a data center cutoff is bad on an under voltage too.

1) grid under supplies and voltage drops
2a) grid requests more power from flexible (gas) plants
2b) HUGE customers completely cut their draw
3) more power with less demand causes huge over voltage

Is Twitter operating just as well?

The gutted moderation lead to a lot less advertisers bidding on views.

The unreliability of the service during the transition to being so far reduced dramatically reduced the number of daily users.

The company isn't public, so we don't know if it's making more/losing less money than it was. But we can be pretty certain that the operations are not the same (reduced users less money per user).

They probably didn't want to do a large build if it's 30% price increase on a years old device.