Comment Re:Did they say (Score 1) 54
Did they say why anyone should give a shit about this?
I am wondering for example do they see themselves more as Vogons or more as the civilization which formerly populated Magrathea.
Did they say why anyone should give a shit about this?
I am wondering for example do they see themselves more as Vogons or more as the civilization which formerly populated Magrathea.
Well, If a president can order people to be arrested anywhere in the country for the sake of the border just because their skin and hair is too dark.... If another president's very discussion of the topic because his/her skin and hair is too dark causes the individuals carrying out the orders in the first case to cry "unconstitutional!" in the second case.... We already lost the argument over "who's data" a long time ago.
I remember reading the exact same headline about Go some time ago. Then some time before that C++...... Java as well.
and I will blame trump for forgetting not to sit down with the taliban to sign a pledge to withdraw completely from afghanistan in 4 months.
Did Trump not take the time during that meeting to for some reason mention how unfair data center regulations were ? Am I mistaken?
That the more people use it the less it is worth?
I don't know about the fluff thing. Yes generative AI and chatbot for end users is bad application development at its worst. But haven't large shops been platform assisting/web assisting for decades? I look at the linux kernel and see prolific patchers that i think must be using some kind of automated assist and have been for a long time. Nobody's that smart.
This might be a weird thought: can we choose a president based on their policy ideals and character rather than inconsequential attributes such as race, religion, gender, and how entertaining they are?
yes but can you really and truly say that the main reason they first black president of the united states was elected was because he was black or mainly because he was a good choice? I myself find it much more likely the current president was elected just because he was white.
fair and good points. by that standard though every president is a war criminal. but this administration and its supporters democrat AND republican had long ranted a black person could not ever win the presidency. when then election approached there were comments from many in politics and media that he will not be ALLOWED to serve. when a black person was sworn in he spent two terms being threatened with impeachment for things he never did. while watching the current president commit those exact same violations, just about every one of the reasons they demanded the back person be removed from office, they dismissed with no complaint. so I have to say in some way a black president would be held to a higher standard?
Why does it seem like we are driving society towards self-isolation with less and less human interaction?
Because the people calling the shots hate "other" humans.
and are actually willing to discuss the possibility of "indentured servitude", just discuss mind you....
another African American president is where this road leads hopefully.......
So the current administration has obviously read All of William Gibson's books?
by "others" I mean "anyone"'s ability to moderate and I guess see, to clarify the references in both posts. and I did not mention that any flagging action by the viewer or viewers was initiated to cause this assuming no action was requested. but thank you for your reply.
What constitutional rights of Meta were violated?
I would like to know also?
and completely off topic.
but does this website have the right to monitor your browsing and remove threads they do not want you to see?
just asking?
and again not the topic of the article.
but can they deny others the ability to moderate one comment as opposed to another?
just asking again.
and completely off topic.
but does this website have the right to monitor your browsing and remove threads they do not want you to see?
just asking?
"I don't believe in sweeping social change being manifested by one person, unless he has an atomic weapon." -- Howard Chaykin