yes but can you really and truly say that the main reason they first black president of the united states was elected was because he was black or mainly because he was a good choice? I myself find it much more likely the current president was elected just because he was white.

fair and good points. by that standard though every president is a war criminal. but this administration and its supporters democrat AND republican had long ranted a black person could not ever win the presidency. when then election approached there were comments from many in politics and media that he will not be ALLOWED to serve. when a black person was sworn in he spent two terms being threatened with impeachment for things he never did. while watching the current president commit those exact same violations, just about every one of the reasons they demanded the back person be removed from office, they dismissed with no complaint. so I have to say in some way a black president would be held to a higher standard?

and are actually willing to discuss the possibility of "indentured servitude", just discuss mind you....

another African American president is where this road leads hopefully.......

So the current administration has obviously read All of William Gibson's books?

by "others" I mean "anyone"'s ability to moderate and I guess see, to clarify the references in both posts. and I did not mention that any flagging action by the viewer or viewers was initiated to cause this assuming no action was requested. but thank you for your reply.

I would like to know also?

and again not the topic of the article.
but can they deny others the ability to moderate one comment as opposed to another?
just asking again.

and completely off topic.
but does this website have the right to monitor your browsing and remove threads they do not want you to see?
just asking?

I am now more encouraged by the fact that any service/product is not inherently constitutional just because the mentioned. self labeled "industrialists" providing said service in their defence say people are "too stupid" to reject it.

He did. Long they argued that exploitation was inevitable even constitutional and the fact that a person's influence in this civilization was chained to how willing you were to exploit Epstein-like situstions was obvious, and I'm just going by the following: The names dropped as holding the baton tended to be of a certain financial security while the people receiving said baton were below that ceiling.

What a user does on a computer on a platform tends to be about, replication and not artistic output. The art of it is telling the replicator well, what to replicate. People are using AI agents to demand relevant, wide scoped, project defining output with vague generalized abbreviated human language. Therefore the output due to their own ignorance is a mess of mass produced garbage. So I am of a mind that it is not the fault of the agent.

I'm pretty sure they helped my elementary school by their computers and this was back when most elementary didn't have a single one for students to access.

the comment never compared chrome to macs other to say that they are both bad? just opinion and not an unpopular one at that.

and ill take this opportunity to go completely off topic to say the modding system is completely unfair. just my opinion.