Using a middle eastern supplied bribery plane as air force one is totally ok for security but robots and inverters are a threat? Security theater.

I used to like Apple as the scrappy underdog giving people tools and free software other companies charged for. Now Apple is heading toward being another greedy corporation nickel and diming their users for money without adding value. It is bizarre Apple would spend time, money, and expertise developing a Tech feature to help creditors go after its customers and users, particularly given its recent software failures. Apple used to be morally anchored under Steve Jobs as going after the big guy while looking out for the little guy . Or maybe it was just good PR. But at least it worked. Now Apple is helping its fellow big guy as a big guy and throwing its products and customers under the bus and does not care.

Cool. I will come to you when someone tells me to get a grep. :)

It seems like government overreach to go after commercial routers. National security has to be related to the military or government in some way. Their systems should stop the bots rather than banning commercial routers. They have no right to simply declare certain routers to be insecure. Companies can corruptly bribe an administration to allow their routers and block their competitors.

Were hieroglyphs just family vacay pics.

Thanks for taking time from yelling at kids to get off yo mamas lawn to post this.

Or more like in case of volcano, use stairs.

It said in case of fire, use stairs.

It said âoeIn case of fire, use stairsâ. (Yes, I know elevators were not yet invented, that is the joke)

This will just weaken immune systems since people will not be exposed to viruses.

If piracy is not stealing, then adultery is not cheating?

Just burn it to a CD

Stealing, or theft, is understood as the unlawful taking of anotherâ(TM)s property. Copyright infringement is unlawful. Copying software without a license/permission is copyright infringement. Therefore, copying software without a license/permission is theft. It has nothing to do with depriving anyone of anything, but simply a taking without permission. Otherwise you could argue that taking your neighborâ(TM)s jewelry is not theft if they donâ(TM)t wear it since itâ(TM)s not depriving them of its use. This is not legal advice. Please consult a lawyer for legal advice.

The concern is how that wealth buys access and political power, or even worse, how one person can gate keep access to political power. Democracy was designed to diffuse political power, and so hight concentration of wealth in a single person leans antidemocratic.

Since this trial centered around capital, the jury should have issued the death penalty for everyone since that is capital punishment. Just kidding. Lol. :)