Comment Re:On the bright side... (Score 1) 231
But with your strange voting system that'll be difficult and at least two years away.
That's what happens when you pay $60B for a VS code fork.
On the contrary it sounds like he did a ton to fix the supply chain.
But he fixed it for Apple Shareholders and customers, instead of Americans in general.
As a Canadian, I'm probably happier buying from China than the US at this point.
People on ALL social media NEED to see what the other side says just as much as their own. Echo chambers make everything worse for everyone.
Ragebait isn't about seeing what the other side says.
It's about seeing an inflammatory caricature of the other side.
For example, a Liberal isn't going to see some Conservative discussing some of the hard tradeoffs we'll need to pay down the debt. They'll see a Conservative proposing that Trump be given a 3rd term and trans kids get rounded up and forced into conversion therapy or some crap like that.
Meanwhile, Conservatives won't see some Liberal discussing the economics of Universal Healthcare. They'll see someone proposing that the police be defunded and all drugs are legalized.
Ragebait creates echo chambers because it gives the false impression that everyone on the other side is insane.
This is why a lot of chronic diseases will NEVER have cures. It's more profitable to treat than to cure. Treat someone over a lifetime and milk 100k out of them. Treat someone once and present them with a 100k price tag to pay all at once and the consumer or insurance company will balk at the cost.
It's a fun conspiracy theory, but this is actually just how biology works.
There's basically four kinds of things that can go wrong with our bodies. Infections, mechanical issues, system errors, and cancer.
Infections we can cure by helping the body to kill off the infection, it's only some rare stubborn ones like AIDS that are chronic like you describe.
Mechanical issues we can fix with surgery.
System errors? That's stuff like genetic disorders where our body creates too much of hormone A or doesn't create the proper form of protein B. The problem is in our DNA and you can't cure it without rewriting our DNA (which we're getting to).
And then there's cancers, which are similar to infections, where we try to kill it (as they're doing here), though weirdly, some research suggests treating it as a chronic issue might be better for the patients.
In either case, it's not the fact that pharma is deciding "don't make a pill to cure it, just find a lifetime treatment!". It's only in the past few years that we're reaching the point where we can actually cure things that were traditionally chronic.
And Threads now appears to have roughly 66% more monthly active users than X.
I've heard almost nothing about Threads recently. Certainly no indication they were more popular than Twitter.
Is their user count some sort of trick with how they interface with Instagram? Or is Twitter just turning into a ghost town without people realizing it?
This is one of the reason why Western governments do invest in foreign aid.
It's not just charity (though that's certainly an element), but the more stable and prosperous developing nations are the less likely they're going to have to deal with a refugee crisis.
I never see Democrats defend Pelosi trading. I see maggots defending Trump grifts constantly. I hang out in places where I'm exposed to both. Stop making shit up, maggot.
I think there's some nuance needed there.
Pelosi's trading is legal, it's highly problematic from an ethics perspective, but it's completely legal and somewhat common for legislators to do. So she can be criticized for using an unfair advantage, but it's not unprecedented nor a major sin.
Trump's grifts on the other hand do violate laws and precedent, those laws just aren't enforced.
For an extra $100k you get a pardon!
I like work; it fascinates me; I can sit and look at it for hours.