Comment Re:Well done Krafton (Score 1) 24
Please let me clarify that I was tanking about Krafton and their AI innitiative specifically.
Seen many a comment, so I'll respond generically:
Your top performers are separated intwo groups, those who are genuinely excited to work with AI, and those who do not, with a very small group of "don't cares". Guess who stays and who leaves.
In the mid-range and low tier something similar occurs. Also, in those two populations the group of "don't cares" is much bigger.
This will self-select out the people that will either actively or passive-agressively oppose AI to leave on their own volition. And avoid mass layoffs which may attract scrutiny in SouthKorea specifically, and more generaly, worldwide.
Also, some people that were mid-tier before AI, may move up or down the tier list as AI is introduced. Good in both cases (the one who moved up became more productive and we keep, the ones who moved down are primed for the next round of layoffs).
Then you focus on the low tier workers post AI. Doing a "justifiable firing" case for those should be easy. If you achieve the desired employment levels, then mission acomplished. Otherwise:
Then comes the work-mobbing/slow firing of the mid-tier workers that were not smart enough to go on their own volition until you acquire satisfactoy employment levels.