Wait - Hillary AND Trump are working for Putin??!! Wow.
Hopefully they never come back up! It would be great to live in a world with the above gone. Hopefully the FANG companies are next to go.
You can hate on all those very popular sites all you want, but it's affecting my tiny websites too.
It's weird. I remember when a sitting president was sued for sexual assault, and at the time Democrats didn't seem to find the allegations credible. Nor the rape allegations. Well, I'm sure they had their reasons beyond just, you know, rank hypocrisy.
If Democrats didn't have double standards, they'd have no standards at all.
Has it now gotten to the point where I am more likely to be lynched for being like Hugh Hefner than Bruce Jenner?
The way they're going, you're more likely to be lynched for continuing to refer to Bruce Jenner by the name his parents gave him at birth.
Of course, the bastards will then come after me for this post because IDGAF about Bruce's delusions...or theirs.
But with all that Trump has said or promoted, I've not seen yet where he came out to promote the agenda that is against equality in matters of gender and race.
You haven't seen him say it because he hasn't said it. The extreme-left noise machine has thrown out all of these...um...trumped-up charges, and their stenographers in the "mainstream" media have reliably parroted it far and wide.
It's almost as if the Bush and Clinton families are both criminal enterprises...
They were certainly both culpable in collecting money for Haiti that went into pockets of people that did little or nothing to actually help the people of Haiti.
Sure, they source things and explain why they rated things the way they did (like rating Obama's statement that "people buy guns over the Internet without a background check" during a speech calling for better background check laws as TRUE by qualifying the statement with "He never said people do that legally).
But no one ever looks at that. They look at the rating which often has twisted justifications that are, yes, clearly biased. But, like I said, no one looks at the justification. In fact, they will propagate nonsense like a aggregate of a bunch of rating as if they were unassailable facts to judge the "truthfulness" of one candidate or organization compared to another. When all that aggregate really tells you is how biased those "fact check" sites actually are.
Your program is sick! Shoot it and put it out of its memory.