I see the Anonymous Coward's from AT&T, Verizon, Spectrum and all of the other big ISPs and Internet backbone providers have joined in the fray to support the Governments endorsement of their price gouging oligarchy. Ajit Pai is a first generation descendant of people from the Indian sub-continent; anything good enough for the folks over there is more than good enough for the U.S.A. I don't like the man as he is a raging Corporatist. As to affordability, the major players in the game have an informal cabal to control access to real broadband on the internet. And pricks who say move to where there is decent bandwidth because the cabal is trying to more than maximize their profit is a Libertarian Jerk. And these big companies use the government to prevent new entrants in the market who would like to provide affordable internet.

I am an old fart over 60 years old. There was cable T.V. in the middle of the 1950s which we had per my father. So there was coax in houses over 60 years ago. Quit making dumb statements about technology.

I was lead to understand that the dimensions of lumber are the cut size when it is cut from the green logs. Between drying and planing the size is reduced so that a 2" x 4" is actually 1.5" x 3.5". The Wikipedia article on lumber seems to be fine. I have noticed at some of the big box stores that they put the actual size on the placard identifying the lumber.

I will be glad for the Progressive womyn to go on a sexstrike. It will lower the reproduction rate of Progressives and possibly lead to their eventual extinction by self selection.

Part of the problem is that you Progressives would like to make it a felonious crime to not exult LGBT.... persons but oh those horrible conservatives who would just like them to not flaunt their deviation from the norm in everyone's faces.

That was the way it was in rural areas (no electric grid) ;until as late as the 1960's (for those further out). Even with transmission lines crossing their properties, farmers and ranchers could not get electricity because "it just would not be profitable to serve them". The Electric Co-operative system alleviated this except for a few people in very remote areas. Where I am moving to in Bandera County Texas, the local electric co-op is working to put fiber to the premises in the denser rural areas. The last I looked a few years ago it still cost over $10,000 a mile to put in fiber.

Yes AT&T, Verizon, Comcast, Charter, Frontier and others need to make a profit; but what they want is a HUGE profit because that is what benefits the board of directors, presidents, vice-president, and directors the most. The real customers of these companies are the stockholders and not the people they provide services to. Due to the forces of the stock markets, the quarterly bottom line drives everything. This then causes the biggest problem these companies have in that they would like the Federal and State governments to hand them an oligopoly by preventing any entity but them to provide any internet services even if they are not going to put any into an area for the next few decades or century. This would probably include my electric co-op being stopped.

But you would hire lying, criminal, illegal drug abusers.

(Sarcasm)
I think the copyright holders of the world need to lobby to have all people wear a system whereby they can ascertain what an individual has heard or seen and send them and the source a bill for hearing or seeing the copyrighted work. I think that all music, all sounds, all books, all poems, and all physical items should be put under eternal copyright by someone (in the entertainment or publishing industry) so that even seeing a country side scene can put a person in jeopardy of copyright infringement.
(Sarcasm off)

Unfortunately I don't think I am far off the mark of a lot of people who think that everything should be "owned" (and by them).

Unfortunately you are wrong concerning Christian scripture. It is divided into two sections, that before The Christ, The Old Testament, and that written of and after The Christ, The New Testament.

The Old Testament centers around the history of the Jews with some history (in a more allegorical sense) before them. While the Jews were commanded to do warfare against their enemies up to and including wiping them out (not unusual 3000 years ago) to preserve themselves and their way, they were also commanded not to commit murder as the Hebraic word used in the Ten Commandments refers to murder and not killing. Properly rendered in modern English it might read "You shall not murder".

The New Testament never condones murder. The most emphatic statement is when The Christ states to turn ones cheek even "seventy times seven" (an Aramaic hyperbole to express a great many and not really a specific number) to ones enemy. Christians were commanded to submit to the authorities as long as it did not impinge on their beliefs. The closest to any violence is when The Christ tells his disciples to obtain a sword for self protection in the very violent world of the times 2000 years ago.

The Qu'ran is replete with commands to kill all unbelievers and even those who don't hold the same view of the Islamic religion. If you can find any factual basis in which Jews or Christians are commanded to kill unbelievers on that basis only, present it. Otherwise quite making baseless statements!!

Since you two are so bothered by truth, here are some citations:

Working Paper Series, Congressional Budget Office -- Taxation of Owner-Occupied and Rental Housing

This is from a Democrat Majority U.S. Congress along with a Democrat predominant Executive Branch (President and Departments). See page 3.

Taxing Homeowners as if They Were Landlords

Oh great, now the information on taxing FOSS has been created. The government can now demand to know how much FOSS a person or company is using and then tax them on the "value" of it even though you paid nothing (and for individuals not earning anything from it).

If you don't know how a government does imputed income, let me cite an example that almost got done. The current US "regime" wanted to charge home owners who had taken a mortgage on a house years ago and were making relatively small payments by current rates, the difference between what their house would rent for (if it was more than the mortgage payment) and the mortgage payment as imputed income. Yes, if you were paying $500 a month and the house could rent for $1500, you would have to add $12000 to your annual income in "imputed" income.

Now take that and apply it to FOSS. One single distribution in use could be imputed to be worth thousands of dollars. Microsoft, Oracle and others would love to latch onto that and use it to kill FOSS if they can only get the government to do their bidding. The ability to do this in other countries may vary but probably not by much.

You've hit upon what I read into the OP. The writer seems to be moaning about anybody being able to write a program, period. I guess the OP might believe we should license all programmers after a sufficient course of education and only allow licensed programmers to have access to programming tools. The rest of you proles can take a hike and beg the Programmers to do something or pay them exorbitant amounts of money to get something.

I have seen this in industry where the IT people started to try to corner ALL programming in a company. They proposed that if it even slightly fell into the realm of programming, one would have to submit a proposal and MONEY to the programming group. They would then decided if was needed and prioritize it. Then six months to a year later one would get the first cut at the product. Fortunately the proposal/process died an early death.

The Dalton Minimum occurred about 200 years ago primarily in the early 19th Century. It wasn't as severe as the Maunder Minimum but there was substantial cooling. But all of this is heresy to the disciples of the religion of AGW who have settled the political pseudo-science of AGW and threaten skeptics with "re-education", imprisonment or even death.

The Constitution of the United States (not your personal constitution, not the unwritten constitutional law of Great Britain, etc.) limits the Federal government to the regulation of Interstate Commerce. It should not have the scope to regulate business that does not cross the boundaries of the many States. For example, if I sell produce raised in the garden on my land to my neighbors or at a stand on the road I live on or even to a local store, I am not engaging in interstate commerce as my reach does not cross State lines. Now the State or the County or the City/Town/Village that I live in may regulate my business; but that is not encompassed by the U.S. Constitution. I know there are people who believe that we don't live in such an environment but in a totally top down government like those in many other parts of the world. And there are those who are wishing it were that way and even those who are fighting to make it top down. But it isn't so yet. Hillary Clinton is one of the latter. She and the Democrat Party would like nothing more than turning the States into mere departments of the Federal Government wherein the big cities of the East and West coasts could suck the money, life and freedom from the rest of the country. They desire the world of the Hunger Games.

'Nuf said.

Wrong, Wrong, Wrong to you. The Annenberg Public Policy Center which you point to is dominated by Progressives/Leftists. Therefore their "facts" are debatable as they continually lean heavily to the Leftists narrative (since in Leftist minds, narrative trumps facts).

You are completely wrong on the 2000 election. They told the State of Florida that they could not selectively recount the ballots. There was an attempt to recount only in areas that were run by Democrats and therefore through some of the outrageous rules of the recount such as if a ballot counter thought that the Gore chad had been touched by the punching pen when neither chad was punched then the vote was to be counted for Gore. That is Democrat voting; yes, Lyndon Johnson's people fixed the ballot in Texas that got him to the House of Representatives and yes, The Dailey Machine in Chicago fixed the Illinois results that got John Kennedy elected.

The problem with this decision is that the many and several States of the United States are quickly being relegated to only departments of the Federal Government. For you foreigners that comment here please understand that the United States is not as unified governmentally as most of your countries are and the Federal Government is to have limited powers, as delineated in the Constitution of the United States, with all others being given to the States per the 10th amendment of the Constitution . This has crossed the line of that delineation in many, many minds.