Comment Re:Good luck with that (Score 1) 123
And even if they do revise it to including slicing software, good luck enforcing that in open source slivers not based in the USA...
I'm going to chime in with getting to university in Europe is a lot harder than in the United States. I know the schools in Switzerland have high stakes exams regularly that *do* filter the majority towards what we could consider trade-schools.
Those who do get in, as you said, their university education is essentially free.
I worked for a HMO from 2000s to 2010s. During my time there, we consolidated to a single building and were issued new badges that contained a RDIF that could be read remotely.
Every couple of minutes security would 'ping' the building and see where everyone was in the name of safety and security.
One day I had a gastro-issue and spent a lot of time in the restroom, and to my horror, there was a knock on my stall's door from security to see if I was okay.
After that, I would leave my badge at my desk while in the office.
So, basically not new technology, just using WiFi to do the checks vs RF.
I'm glad you got to have kids and watch them grow from birth. I never got to do that; I married a gal and the boys were already ten and eleven years old when I entered their life.
I agree. I think a second benefit could be that interested high school (or college) students now get a data source that doesn't change locations from administration to administration. It is mildly frustrating to me that many government websites simply change where things are each year. Worse is when a department goes through the amazingly beneficial operation of name change.
Apparently this was a new test, essentially A B testing. The only difference in the two sets of email were that one set had links to ActBlue and the other set had links to WinRed. The complaint is that the WinRed linking emails were marked as spam but the ActBlue linking emails were not.
And you'd be wrong - Cameron's sub had a sphere for the pilot.
Nice diagram and photos at Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Judging from the British new papers, I'm not surprised at all.
I've noticed the butchering of acronyms (NASA as Nasa or even nasa) for a very long time, and other 'dumbing down' of their language.
It's as if they've taken ee cumming's style to a new extreme.
It's intentionally placed.
Bluetooth circuits are usually licensed for pennies per million by the same companies that sold you the EDA tools (Cadence, Synopsys, etc).
So then why?
Sell at a loss, get placed in all the cheap phones, tablets, PCs in Asia, have instant backdoor access with a simple "knock-knock' packet.
"The chain which can be yanked is not the eternal chain." -- G. Fitch